返回列表 发帖

GWD-8-Q14: GWD-2-11

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives.  However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 

A.       These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.

B.        Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reactions.

C.        Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.

D.       Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.

E.        Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.

答案是D。可是题目中讨论的是对sulfity的过敏,D中Other substance是否无关呢?A又为什么不可以呢?

收藏 分享

这句话麻烦NN能把E选项翻一下么?

谢谢啊~

TOP

这道题感觉出的不好,如果wine里天然地存在sulfite,maker往里加sulfite岂不没事找事?相对来说我觉得A更为合理,如果没有替代品维持wine的preservative,降低过敏反应对商家有什么好处?

TOP

E蛮合理的,那么A呢?

TOP

选E吧,D的确是无关

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看