返回列表 发帖

怎样判断一个商学院教授的好坏

Many schools in China claim that they have world class faculties without providing much supporting evidence. Students are often confuesed on what to look for to see if one school has a real stellar group of faculties. Here are some suggestions

The first thing is to look at the research record of the faculties in the top journals recoginized in the world. The following is a list of top journals compiled by NYU faculties. Another area to look is to see if they have served on editorial boards of the top journals

The second thing is to talk to the alumni of the respective schools and see how they rate their professors. These information are very informative and it also tells you what courses you should bid for.

The third thing is to see if they have more impact in the industry.

Leading Journal 

Accounting

Management

Accounting Review

Academy of Management Journal

Journal of Accounting and Economics

Academy of Management Review

Journal of Accounting Research

Administrative Science Quarterly

Review of Accounting Studies

Organization Science

 

 

 

Strategic Management Journal

Economics

American Economic Review

Marketing

Econometrica

Journal of Consumer Research

Journal of Political Economy

Journal of Marketing Research

Quarterly Journal of Economics

Marketing Science

Review of Economic Studies

 

 

 

Operations

Finance

Manufacturing and Service Operations Mgmt.

Journal of Business (through Nov. 2006)

Mathematics of Operations Research

Journal of Finance

Operations Research

Journal of Financial Economics

 

 

Review of Financial Studies

 

 

 

 

Multiple Disciplines

Information Systems

Management Science

Information Systems Research

 

 

 

MIS Quarterly

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Field Journals

 

 

 

Accounting

Marketing

Contemporary Accounting Research

Quantitative Marketing and Economics

 

 

 

Journal of Marketing

Economics

 

 

 

American Economic Review Proceedings

Statistics/Math

Journal of Econometrics

Annals of Statistics

Journal of Economic Theory

Biometrika

 

 

Journal of American Statistical Association

 

 

 

Journal of Labor Economics
        

Mathematical Programming

Journal of Law and Economics

Annals of Applied Probability

Journal of Monetary Economics

 

 

 

Quantitative Marketing and Economics

Psychology

RAND Journal of Economics

Journal of Applied Psychology

Review of Economics and Statistics

Journal of Experimental Psychology (All)

 

 

 

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Finance

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process

 

 

 

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Management      

Personality and Social Psychology Review

Journal of International Business Studies

Psychological Bulletin

 

 

 

Psychological Review

 

 

 

Psychological Science

收藏 分享

有这么强的师职力量,个人觉得长江办一所Ph.D Program(双语教学)应该比MBA更成功。

TOP

Academic research is good for MBA students

By Peter Golder and Debanjan Mitra

Published: September 22 2008 03:00 | Last updated: September 22 2008 03:00

Should MBA students care about academic research? If you ask students, many would shout: "No!" But our research* may change their minds.

We have found that when a business school generates more research, its graduating students' salaries go up. In fact, an increase of three single authored articles per year across the school leads to a graduate's starting salary going up by $750.

This amount is above the salary graduates would normally receive based on their quality on entering an MBA programme (as reflected by a high GMAT score or low school acceptance rate) and a business school's resources.

Plus, the dollar gains are multiplied across hundreds of students in a typical MBA programme. Since companies are paying these higher salaries, they are obviously recognising the value of students educated in a more research-oriented environment. Equally important, we also find that when the number of faculty research publications increases, students' evaluations of professors also go up.

We believe there are two main causes of these results. First, researchers can teach students state-of-the-art knowledge, including the latest models, findings and frameworks.

A second cause is that research professors can conceptualise problems, generate logically valid hypotheses and then test them with relevant data and appropriate methods. An understanding of this knowledge-discovery process is essential for students who must "learn how to learn", so that their education remains relevant in a fast-changing world.

Our findings are in contrast with the conclusions of Warren Bennis and James O'Toole, published in Harvard Business Review in 2005. They argue that professors focusing on scientific research have taken over schools to the detriment of students. In their words: "The dirty little secret at most of today's best business schools is that they chiefly serve the faculty's research interests and career goals, with too little regard for the needs of other stakeholders."

They argue that professors without managerial experience "don't know how to analyse the indirect and long-term implications of complex business decisions". Their prescription is a dramatic shift back toward hiring more professors who are skilled in, and orientated toward, business practice.

So, which is it? Is research good or bad for MBA students? As more schools jump on the research bandwagon, it is a serious charge that faculty have hijacked their institutions at the expense of students and society.

Our conclusions are supported by 18 years of US News & World Report data on MBA rankings, students' salaries and other variables such as university endowment and reputation. Our measure of faculty research is the number of annual publications in A-level scientific journals compiled by the University of Texas at Dallas. We analyse our data set using appropriate econometric models.

Since we find a positive relationship between academic research and students' salaries, as well as higher student evaluations of professors in more research-orientated departments, it does not appear that a school's non-faculty stakeholders are hurt by investments in academic research.

All-important business problems are complex. We should not denigrate the importance of managerial judgment and experience that accumulate during a career. But neither should we denigrate the value of a systematic, research- based approach to conceptualising and analysing business situations. In business, there are pros and cons to any path but a research approach can help evaluate the validity of these opinions and reach sounder conclusions.

* Debanjan Mitra and Peter N. Golder (2008), 'Does Academic Research Help or Hurt MBA Programs?' Journal of Marketing, 72 (September), 31-49

Peter Golder is associate professor of marketing NYU Stern School of Business. Debanjan Mitra is assistant professor of marketing at Warrington College of Business Administration, University of Florida.The Soapbox column is open to professors, students and others interested in the future of business schools. To comment on this article go to www.ft.com/soapbox

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2008

TOP

Even US MBA applicants do not screen above journals for professors&b-schools evaluation. But they keep their eyes on the figures of salary and ranking from US News and Business week.

TOP

A wonderful suggestion!

however, not practical

TOP

Always the Employment Report!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看