返回列表 发帖

[求助]

OG--3

''Life expectancy''is the average at death of the entire live-born population. In the middle of the nineteenth century, life expectancy in the North America was 40 years, whereas now it is nearly 80 years. Thus, in those days , people must have been considered old at an age that we now consider the prime of life.

which of the following , if ture , undermines the argument above?

(A)  In the middle of the nineteenth century ,  the population of North America was significantly smaller than it is today.

(B) Most of the gains in life expectancy in the last 150 years have come from reductions in the number of infants who die in their first year of life.

(C) Many of the people who live to an advanced age today do so only because of medical techolog that was unknown in the nineteenth century.

(D)  The proportion of people who die in their seventies is significantly smaller today than is the proportion od people  who die in their eighties.

(E) More people in the middle of the nineteenth century engaged regularly in vigorous physical activity than do so today.

请各位帮我分析一下它问什么选B,谢谢!

收藏 分享

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看