返回列表 发帖

0g82

excavation of the ancient city X on the island of C revealed a pattern of debris and  collapsed buildings typical of towns devastated by earthquakes.Archaeologists have hypothesized that the destruction was due to a major earthquake known to have  occured near the island in AD 365.

B no coins minted after AD 365 were found in X,but coins minted before that year were found in abundance

C Most modern histories of C mention that an earthquake occured near the island of C.

Why not C??
收藏 分享

guanweidong once said that if you can demonstrate that the things really happened then you can support the things mentioned. And C has confirmed the existence of the earthquake ,is it not a kind of support?

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看