Environmental organizations want
to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential
development. They plan to do
this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That
plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they
would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other
bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never
actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if
the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial
resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more
sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their
farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following
roles?
- The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as
ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that
rejection.
- The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot
be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
- The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be
attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
- The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which
are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis
for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
- The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the
second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that
goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
请教各位NN，这种类型的解题思路是什么。我排除不了B。
| 
