返回列表 发帖

[求助]GWD6-11有个小问题

Q11:
In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting lobsters from the territorial waters of the country of Belukia.  Soon after, the annual tonnage of lobster legally harvested in Belukian waters began declining; in 1996, despite there being no reduction in the level of legal lobster fishing activity, the local catch was 9,000 tons below pre-1992 levels.  It is therefore highly likely that the outlaw fishing boats harvested about 9,000 tons of lobster illegally that year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A The illegal lobster harvesting was not so extensive that the population of catchable lobsters in Belukia’s territorial waters had sharply declined by 1996.
B The average annual lobster catch, in tons, of an outlaw fishing boat has increased steadily since 1992.
C Outlaw fishing boats do not, as a group, harvest more lobsters than do licensed lobster-fishing boats.
D The annual legal lobster harvest in Belukia in 1996 was not significantly less than 9,000 tons.
E A significant proportion of Belukia’s operators of licensed lobster-fishing boats went out of business between 1992 and 1996.
   Answer: a

有个小问题,A我觉得是没错,但是解释起来有点怪:had后是不是应该有not才能使结论成立,要是按照我的翻译,就是A选项龙虾的数量减低了,那就不合题意啊,我看了天山的讨论帖,还是没回答我这个问题,请教斑竹

收藏 分享

 那就是说,这个句子就好比I DO NOT THAT THINK YOU ARE  GOOD一样,否定谓语也就否定了从句

TOP

题目说从92年开始有了非法捕虾,并且告诉我们合法的捕虾活动水平没有下降,因此,

1996年的合法捕虾的亏空就是非法捕虾造成的

但必须有关前提,即每年都有持续稳定数量的虾供大家来捕,如果虾的总数在1992到1996

的时候有下降的花,那么96年少捕的虾就不能归罪于非法捕虾,而是大自然给的少了。

A说的没错:非法捕虾没有造成可供捕获的龙虾的数码大幅下降。

如果如楼主同学所说加了not,那么意思反而不对了,请注意主句的否定。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看