返回列表 发帖

(讨论) 一道逻辑题


In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.
If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?
Answer: (B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.

What is this mean: ''...,but not voters who support the other candidate."?
难懂。望指教。fficeffice" />

收藏 分享

...,but not voters who support the other candidate."?
就是说第三个党派不会拉走支持两大党派中某一派的选票。
真挺让人费解的
“张华考上了北京大学;李萍进了中等技术学校;我在百货公司当售货员:我们都有光明的前途。”——《新华字典》1998年修订本P673……

TOP

What is this mean: ''...,but not voters who support the other candidate."?
就是说第三个党派不会拉走支持两大党派中某一派的选票。
答案你翻译一下就出来了,其他几个选项好象没有迷惑fficeffice" />

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看