返回列表 发帖

大全3-15,怎么没有讨论过?

In the United States, the Postal Service has a monopoly on first-class mail, but much of what is sent first class could be transmitted electronically. Electronic transmittal operators argue that if the Postal Service were to offer electronic transmission, it would have an unfair advantage, since its electronic transmission service could be subsidized from the profits of the monopoly.

15.   Which of the following, if each is true, would allay the electronic transmittal operators’ fears of unfair competition?

(A) If the Postal Service were to offer electronic transmission, it could not make a profit on first-class mail.

(B) If the Postal Service were to offer electronic transmission, it would have a monopoly on that kind of service.

(C) Much of the material that is now sent by first-class mail could be delivered much faster by special package couriers, but is not sent that way because of cost.

(D) There is no economy of scale in electronic transmission—that is, the cost per transaction does not go down as more pieces of information are transmitted.A

(E) Electronic transmission will never be cost-effective for material not sent by first-class mail such as newspapers and bulk mail.

收藏 分享

many  thanks !!!

TOP

支持A

TOP

是不是选A啊, 他说If the Postal Service were to offer electronic

transmission, it could not make a profit on first-class mail, 既然POSTS

ERVICE如果提供了electronic transmission, 就不能从first-class mail获得

利润,那么 Electronic transmittal operators 说Postal Service 用从first-class

mail获得的垄断利润支持electronic transmission service 就不能成立了啊, (没

有利润, 怎么支持Electronic transmittal ?)

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看