No, I'm sorry but I think you've missed the point of this question. In this argument which says the carpenters before 1930 are better than those who in nowdays based on the performance of the architecture based on the comparison between the old hotel's delicate carpentry and the carpentry in nowdays bulding. D says this comparison is not fair one since the author attempts to compare the best remainings with the buildings in nowdays. It is not a peer to peer comparison. So D almost questioned the validation of the logical thread rather than to find out an other reason to weaken it. |