- 精华
- 2
- 积分
- 2676
- 经验
- 2676 点
- 威望
- 242 点
- 金钱
- 683 ¥
- 魅力
- 440
|
Questions 33-34
Conservationist: The population of a certain wildflower is so small that the species is headed for extinction. However, this wildflower can cross-pollinate with a closely related domesticated daisy, producing viable seeds. Such cross-pollination could result in a significant population of wildflower-daisy hybrids. The daisy should therefore be introduced into the wildflower’s range, since although the hybrid would differ markedly from the wildflower, hybridization is the only means of preventing total loss of the wildflower in its range.
33. Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the conservationist’s reasoning?
(A) It is better to take measures to preserve a valued type of organism, even if those measures are drastic, than to accept a less valuable substitute for the organism.
(B) It is better to preserve a type of organism that is in danger of extinction, even if surviving organisms of that type are not vigorous, than to allow something more vigorous to replace it.
(C) It is better to change a type of organism that would otherwise be lost, even if the changes are radical, than to lose it entirely.
(D) It is better to destroy one of two competing types of organisms, even if both are irreplaceable, than to allow both of them to be lost.
(E) It is better to protect an endangered type of organism, even if doing so has some negative effects on another type of organism, than to do nothing at all.
The best answer is C.
先理解题意:wildflower会很快extinct如果不采取措施的话。但这个wildflower能与另外一种植物daisy cross-pollinate (异花受粉),从而produce viable seeds,产生一种杂交品种wildflower-daisy hybrid。虽然杂交后的植物differ markedly,但这是唯一一种阻止wildflower在其领域消失的方式。提问哪种原则能支持这种推理?
原文是cross-pollinate and produce seeds, 而不是preserve。
同上,preserve不对,而且vigorous没有提到。
“change a type” 与“produce seeds”、“wildflower-daisy hybrids”相符;“radical”与“markedly”相对应。 So C is the best answer.
“destroy”与“competing types”无关,排除。
negative effects 无关,排除
解题的关键是如何抽象原文,并运用无关排除法。(顺便把34题也说了:)) |
|