Bala

新PREP 1：78.        (32009-!-item-!-188;#058&006754)
Kitchen magazine plans to license the use of its name by a line of cookware. For a magazine, licensing the use of its name for products involves some danger, since if the products disappoint consumers, the magazine's reputation suffers, with consequent reductions in circulation and advertising. However, experts have evaluated the cookware and found it superior to all other cookware advertised in Kitchen.Therefore, Kitchen can collect its licensing fee without endangering its other revenues.
The argument above assumes which of the following?

A. No other line of cookware is superior to that which will carry the Kitchen name.
B. Kitchen will not license the use of its name for any products other than the line of cookware.
C. Makers of cookware will not find Kitchen a less attractive advertising vehicle because the magazine's name is associated with a competing product.（Answer）
D. Consumers who are not regular readers of Kitchen magazine will be attracted to the cookware by the Kitchen name.
E. Kitchen is one of the most prestigious cooking-related magazines.
lion1096: 这个GWD的KICHEN确定是变体，原文没有HOWEVER后面的内容。

Bala

25、杂志销量（PREP变体）
V1 from lion1096
有一个有印象的是GWD原题，说的就是神马KICHEN的杂志还有COCK-WARE的互相广告宣传神码的关系，然后说如果WARE有危险也会影响杂志的销量什么的。忘了问什么了，不过问的方式还有选项变了。同学们可以看看文章就行。

考古
V1  Kitchen magazine那题，GWD的变体，大概意思是说：Kitchen magazine plans to license the use of its name by a line of cookware. 但consultant还是什么专家之类的建议说这样做有危险，因为consumer如果觉得cookware不如杂志上所描述的那么好，会给杂志带来不好的影响。问能推出什么？我选：如果consumer觉得cookware像杂志上描述得一样好，会给杂志带来更好的效益。

Bala

考古
V1  一个小学的操场里发现有毒物质，有个鸟人就说是因为这里以前是农田，有毒物质是以前农民撒的农药遗留下来的。问评价。有个答案是：建学校时是否有用其它地方的土。我选这个。
V2  某学校的操场的土含有毒物质，分析的人怀疑这跟建这个操场的这块地以前是orchar，施过农药有关。问evaluate。
我选建这个操场是否用到了其他地方的土。

Bala

24、学校操场的放射性物质
V1 from lion1096
一个学校的操场的土里检查出来有铅还有神马总之就是个放射性物质，这里知道1950s还是个农场然后科学家就像是不是那时候残留下来的。问评价，我选的是这里的土是不是因为建筑的原因从外地运过来的，应该是对的。
V2 from yaxunsherry
学校操场的土里面监测出来放射物质什么的，问evaluate。选了建筑的时候用了从外面搬来的材料什么的那个选项。