返回列表 发帖
QUOTE:
以下是引用xiner_333在2009-8-10 16:07:00的发言:

 

1    GWD-11-Q3:

Unlike human runners, who broke the four-minute mile in 1954 and they consistently recorded faster times ever since, horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have had winning times with little improvement:  Secretariat’s world-record-breaking Derby tine of 1:59 2/5, for example, was set in 1973 and remained unsurpassed more than a quarter of a century later.


 

A.    they consistently recorded faster times ever since, horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have had winning times with little improvement

B.    they have consistently recorded faster times ever since, those of horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have shown little improvement in winning times

C.    have consistently recorded faster times ever since, horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have shown little improvement in winning times

D.    have consistently recorded faster times ever since, in those of classic races such as the Kentucky Derby, horses have had winning times with little improvement

E.    consistently recorded faster times ever since, those of horses in classic races such as the Kentucky Derby have shown little improvement in winning times

 

E(C)

 

我不是什么老师,叫我老詹好了... btw 我的名字是James不是Jmaes

 

这个题目是GWD的传统争议题目,呵呵,既然是争议题目那就是到现在为止也没有一个明确的答案

不过如果是我的话我会坚定不移地选择C

 

A和B的错误是相对明显的,and 前面是一个定语从句有疑问代词who引导,但是后面却是一个完整的主谓结构they consistently recorded faster times ever since,这种平行是不允许的。 改正最直接的办法是去掉they 直接用and连接谓语动词用并列结构直接作who的从句的谓语部分修饰human runner;

另一方面,句子的实际意思就是再说人类成天刷新自己的纪录而马没有,所以AB中they开头的描述都是描述human runner的,逻辑意思上也支持上面语法规则的判断。

 

D的错误也是明显的, in those of classic races such as the Kentucky Derby中的those指代不明确,不知所谓,其次,这个部分作为一个插入结构,既可以向前作定语从句的状语部分 也可以向后作主句的谓语结构,有歧义。

 

E的错误并不明显,但是those of hoses的those指代很奇怪,一般来说 these those this that这样的指示代词通常情况下指代的是前面的某个名词的整体结构,而不是核心词 从这个角度上讲 它应该指代human runners,这就很古怪了。另外就好像robbie说的,如果直接用horses会对句子造成歧义么?明显是不会的,那么为什么要故意冗余的取用those of horses呢? E的另一个问题就是完成时态的使用,因为人类刷新纪录是一个从过去开始一直持续到现在并且还在折腾的一个动作,这个动作应该用完成时态,更何况还有ever since这样的强烈时间标志

 

当然以上仅仅是我个人的理解,我也不是什么老师,只是一个对GMAT还比较感兴趣 愿意和大家一起探讨的学伴而已

 

 

 

-------------------欢迎访问 www.beyondgmat.cn

TOP

不好意思哦! 我抢着回答了....... 说错了不许笑啊!

TOP

(1)头一个争议题, 我觉得答案应该是C 因为有unlike种连词, 就像although一样, 通常后面用完成时态, 而且those of horses绝对没有horses简洁, 但是争议的地方应该是, 如果用完成时, 就无法和前面的broke的失态平行了, 所以导致难以分析啊!但是C里面有个ever since所以看起来也就没那么怪了, 完成时是为了和ever since对称嘛!

 

 

(2)下面一个争议题, 我倾向选E, 因为我觉得 to be 比 as a 更加能体现时间上的含义, Marconi是觉得radio以后将来, 所以用to be好些, 而且C里面的that离应该修饰的a tool的距离有点远, 看起来离名词coversation过近, 虽然有两个a tool开始的独立主格, 可是后面那个other than what it is实在是太怪, 和precisely完全连部起来!

我到了这里却有个问题,

选项A里我没看见完全很严重的错误, 除了动词优于名词, a tool for coversation也是完全逻辑伴随着前面的整个句子,????所以, A真的有错么?

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看