- 精华
- 2
- 积分
- 1127
- 经验
- 1127 点
- 威望
- 96 点
- 金钱
- 375 ¥
- 魅力
- 199
|
2.1.3 地震前鸟行为
第一段:是关于地震前鸟的异常行为,先讲将1835年智利Chile地震,老人发现一种鸟seabird大群的从海岸飞到内陆,觉得奇怪,因为不是气候变化的时候(有题,取反即可),后来就地震了。
第二段:其他一些地方也有类似的现象。人们就觉得是鸟能感知到地震最初造成的轻微动,试图解释为什么海上一点点变化鸟也会察觉到,唯一能解释原因是bird detected 其他的变化从一个小的变化中 (这里有细节题)
第三段:但是后来说不对,那样的话鸟就应该逃到海上,因为海上伤害比内陆小。
第四段:然后别的地方也都有这样的跟鸟有关的现象。举了其他地震的例子, 说中国地震前也发现有duck 的反常, 什么什么地方也发现鸟往一个洞还是什么里面飞, (这里有题)
(有个题问各地有什么共同点,lz就选了都和鸟有关,因为其他的都很不相关。)
题目:
1.主旨题a argument of ……over a phenomena
2.还有一道是问作者在文章中所举例子的共性是什么?我选的是birds
3.提醒大家读的时候注意什么什么人,貌似是那里的居民,后面两题问到了这些人的态度啊什么的)
4.问智利那地方的人对海鸟有种啥看法,我选的是“当地人认为在天气正常的情况下海鸟不会一大群一起往内陆飞”
5.细节题:bird可以感受到变化
针对第一段的, 说那个most-weather person 在地震发生之间的对seabird有什么样的理解, 其他的选项很迷惑人 我选的是 "只有当稳定的季节结束的时候它们才会往内陆飞"
针对第二段的, 推测, 如果seabird只detect 一个小变化而没有其他的异常, 它们会怎么样? 我觉得也很tricky, 我选的是"它还是会往海上飞", 其他的选项还有"他们能signal storm", 但我根据第二段的解释, 觉得seabird只detect到一个变化的话不会有异常反应
针对最后一段的, 问文中举的例子都提到了, 选项有 wildlife animal, 还有 bird, 还有其他明显错误的答案, 我选bird, 因为中国的duck不算野生动物吧?
我的材料:是一些跟动物地震预报相关的基础知识,当作背景配合jj来看就好
The weather is influenced by factors such as solar activity, globe rotation, warming of the land masses and oceans, and the orbits of the Sun, Moon and planets.
As humans, we consider ourselves to be the most intelligent species on the planet - however, through the refining of our natural behaviours and through the process of our education and ‘advancements’ we have actually lost many (or most) of our basic instincts.
Animals, birds, insects and plant life have a far greater ability to sense and interpret weather changes and signs than humans, and this is linked to their natural survival instincts.
Birds are closer to nature than humans and therefore more sensitive to invisible energies. Their physical actions express approaching prevailing energy – such as earthquakes – before even the most psychic human is aware of it.
If a bird or flock of birds acts strangely, you may be able to deduce that they ‘know’ something that you do not about changes in the weather or an impeding natural event or disaster.
Animals and birds react to signs in many different ways and their irregular behaviour and reactions can predict future significant changes in the weather. Science is yet to determine exactly How animals know what’s to come. Is it a rise or fall in atmospheric pressure; a reaction to the electromagnetic forces generated by sunspots; or even changes in the levels of humidity? Or, is it a combination of these factors, or something entirely different altogether? Whatever the triggers may be, they have an effect on the natural world around us. |
|