返回列表 发帖

GWD 4 -14

Q14: Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?

The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.

Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.

The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.

The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.

The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.

I don't get why D is the right answer. What's the relation between "better quality of carpentry leads to less disuse of building" and the writer's conclusion? I feel no answer is right even I chose A.

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-2-2 15:23:35编辑过]

收藏 分享

因为只有质量好的carpentry,生产在1930的,才能保存到现在。质量差的早就没有了

TOP

so the point is quality of carpentry determines the quality of hotels, not by skill of workers?

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看