[求助]崩溃，这是为什么，请高手指点？

rearn

T-3-Q13.

The traditional treatment of strep infections has been a seven-day course of antibiotics, either penicillin or erythromycin. However, since many patients stop taking those drugs within three days, reinfection is common in cases where these drugs are prescribed. A new antibiotic requires only a three-day course of treatment. Therefore, reinfection will probably be less common in cases where the new antibiotic is prescribed than in cases where either penicillin or erythromycin is prescribed.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A.      Some of people who are allergic to penicillin are likely to be allergic to the new antibiotic.

B.       A course of treatment with the new antibiotic costs about the same as a course of treatment with either penicillin or erythromycin.

C.      The new antibiotic has been shown to be effective in eradicating bacterial infections other than strep.

D.      Some physicians have already begun to prescribe the new antibiotic instead of penicillin or erythromycin for the treatment of some strep infections

E.       Regardless of whether they take a traditional antibiotic or the new one, most patients feel fully recovered after taking the drug for three days.

÷

参考答案是E。一点都搞不明白，怎么会是E呢。请高手指点，谢谢

BruceNornia

把题目翻译一下 ：

 

传统的治疗链球菌感染的方法为一个为期7天的抗生素服用疗程，无论服用的是青霉素或红霉素。然而，由于许多患者在疗程开始的前三天中就停止服用了这些药物，所以对于那些开据上述两类药物作为治疗手段的病例而言，再感染很常见的情况。一种新的抗生素只需要进行为期3天的疗程。因此，相比于使用传统药物的病例，使用新抗生素的病例再感染的可能性应该会大大减小。

 

以下哪项，如果属实，最巩固的论点？
A.那些对青霉素过敏的人很可能对新抗生素也过敏。
B.使用新抗生素的疗程费用大致与传统抗生素疗程相同。
C.新的抗生素已被证明可有效地消灭除链球菌之外的其他细菌。
D.某些医生在治疗链球菌感染时已经开始开具新的抗生素处方，取代了青霉素或红霉素。
E.不管采取传统的抗生素或新抗生素，大部分病人在服用3天后自己都觉得已经完全康复了。

 

这个题目肯定选择E

正是由于他们在服用3天之后觉得完全康复了，所以他们在服用3天之后就停止用要了，而这个成为了采用传统疗程再感染的主要原因

所以如果E是真的，那么采用新药的确可以有效抑制再感染

 

不知道这么说楼主能不能清楚

rheazhang

the passage refers that traditional treatment will normally cost 7 days, while people always take only 3 days - that resulted in the higher reinfection. But even though higher reinfection could happen, then why people still take only 3 days? If the case is E, it will e unnecessary to take the new treatment for 3 days, and the reinfection will be less common.

 

rearn

还不是很明白，文章说如果用后一种药将比前一种药减少复发。

问下边那个加强？

E说两种药用了三天都好了。为什么就加强了？

michizer

Therefore, reinfection will probably be less common in cases where the new antibiotic is

prescribed

这是结论，

E说复发减少因为人们都是3天后就不用药了，（刚好这药就是3天见效，文中），支持了结论

我觉得这题排除比较好，E感觉就是重复了前提many patients stop taking those drugs within three

days

ououbodao

Regardless of whether they take a traditional antibiotic or the new one, most patients feel fully recovered after taking the drug for three days.

无论什么药，大多数病人在吃药后三天感觉康复了，其实还没有康复。一旦病人感觉康复后，他们会停止吃药，从而导致复发。

所以如果新药能在在三天治好病人，就不存在上述问题，就可以减少复发。

poorleafer

偶再补充说明一下：

1，老药的规定服用时间是7天，但是服用3天后病人会感觉已经康复，所以停止吃药，但实际上没有康复，所以导致复发

2，新药的规定服用时间是3天，但如果病人服用1天或2天后就感觉康复也停止吃药的话，也会导致复发，如果是这样的话，新药售卖区域的复发率不一定比老药低。所以，强调新药在服用3天后病人才会康复并且感觉到康复，这样复发率才会真正减低。

所以e能够加强结论的得出。

瑞气横秋

poorleafer 解释得真好！

loveyukibaby

虽然是很久以前的贴了~~但是真的是解决了我的疑问啊~~大感谢！！