prep1-69:with intent of doing还是to do

huangluyaomm

我看过的大部分情况下都是with the intent to do sth.,但此题选C,而C中用的是of doing,难道两者皆可以么?请高人指点

The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.


(A) passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling


(B) the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell
[/font

(C) the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling


(D) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell

(E) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

gmaeeor

umm...prep有的話, 代表GMAC接受such usage...

James

强烈建议你把题目编辑一下...

huangluyaomm

那我们是不是在平时使用时依旧以to do 为主呢

toneere

考点: 逻辑表达（Logical Predication）

1) 动名词结构含有正在进行的意思,多表示动作的过程

2) 修饰语应该尽可能靠近修饰对象,否则很容易引起修饰不清

3) of + doing修饰名词而to do结构修饰动词,表示目的

(A) 从逻辑意思上看The proliferation…导致的结果是反域名强占保护法案的通过,而不是通过的过程,

因此passing应该改为passage,强调结果.in 1999既__________可能修饰Act也可能修饰passing,导致修饰不清；

分词结构allowing…修饰有歧义。

(B) in 1999位置不对,导致修饰不清;with the sole intent that they will sell表达复杂,笨拙.

(C) 正确, lead to the passage强调了结果;which非限定定语从句修饰Act,意思表达清楚;时间状语in

1999紧靠修饰对象the passage,修饰无歧意;用of selling修饰名词intent表达正确

(D) 从逻辑意思上看,The proliferation…导致的结果是法案的通过,而不是导致了法案,因此lead to the

Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999意思表达不完整;with the

sole intent to sell错误,应该改为with the sole intent of selling.

(E) 错误同D,逻辑意思表达不完整

句子结构: The proliferation… led to the passage…of…Act, which allows companies to…

补充说明:

要注意不要将with the sole intent to sell误认为是to do结构表示目的. to do结构修饰的是动词,如果修

饰名词的话应该用A of B结构.with the sole intent没有动词出现,所以应该用of selling来修饰名词

intent

xingzixin

楼上的你这段在prep的解释也写过,此题选C无异议,问题在于,你说to do 结构修饰的是动词,那么对于
The swindler sold the house with
                intent
                to cheat her. 中,你是不是意思to cheat 是修饰sold的?照你这么说我也可以说to sell是修饰register的了,怎么能说没有动词呢?
可见你的补充解释并不正确

mereimoun

这题也是我想问的

intent 的用法，为什么to do是错误的？