OG12th 第65题 原文一句翻译

windows10

Since 1980 the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has received about 280 complaints alleging damage from imports that benefit from subsidies by foreign governments. Another 340 charge that foreign companies “dumped” their products in the United States at "less than fair value".  Even when no unfair practices are alleged, the simple claim that an industry has been injured by imports is sufficient grouds to seek relief.
这句话不懂  65题不知道如何下手。

而且感觉这篇文章挺难的，请问有谁明白的给指点下迷津吧~~谢谢啦：）

pianer

我觉得要理解这句话，要联系前面两句话Since 1980 the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has received about 280 complaints alleging damage from imports that benefit from subsidies by foreign governments.
Another 340 charge that foreign companies “dumped” their products in the United States at “less than fair value.”来理解。前面这两句是说要向ITC提起控诉，要有受到不公正待遇（外国政府补贴的进口产品对其造成损害或是外国公司在美国以低于公平价格倾销他们的产品）的理由。而这句话说即使没有不公正待遇被宣称，简单的声明一个行业已受到进口产品的损害就成为充分的理由去寻求救济。
65题问向ITC控告的最小基础是什么，通过文中这句话“即使没有不公正待遇被宣称，简单的声明一个行业已受到进口产品的损害就成为充分的理由去寻求救济。”，可推出D. The company requesting import relief has been injured by the sale of imports in the United States.

以上是我的一点浅陋见解，如有不妥，请多多指教。

LIANGSHAN

这题的d选项是不是‘公司的进口救济已经被进口品迫害’的意思啊，我觉得不太明白？

xiangzhengj

D项的意思是：在美国，申请进口救济的公司已经由于进口商品受到损害了。也就是说，只要这个公司申明自己的企业因为进口商品受到了损害，就可以申请进口救济了。
二楼分析很透彻了...

xiaochangshni

从“DUMP”，“RELIEF”中，真觉得GMAT比起GRE,考得是熟词多义，而不是生，难词。