- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1790
- 经验
- 1790 点
- 威望
- 178 点
- 金钱
- 178 ¥
- 魅力
- 178
|
这个是我回忆的七宗罪
非因果
The author commits a casual fallacy of oversimplification. The line of reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former is responsible for the latter. However, the fact that A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B. This is fallacious reasoning unless other possible casual explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of both A and B, or perhaps B is caused by D.
错误类比
The author falsely relies on the assumption that A resembles B in all aspects. This assumption is weak, however, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity. For example, A... , but B... . Thus, it may be more difficult for B to ...
时过境迁
The author simply draw the conclusion based on a past event. The event that happened before is unsound to draw a current conclusion. The author assumes that the background condition would remain unchanged in any time or in any places. However, it is not clear in the argument whether the current condition of A is the same as it used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that...
第三选择
The author depends on the assumption that A and B are casually exclusive choices and that there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author offers no reason in the argument to impose an either-or choice. In fact, common sense tells us that adjusting both A and B may produce better results.
个例
The evidence given by the author is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. A single example is logically unsound to draw a general conclusion unless it can be shown that AA is representative of all A. For example, ... In fact, facing with such insufficient evidence, it is impossible to draw the conclusion that ... |
|