返回列表 发帖

TTgwd1-29

本帖最后由 stucashS 于 2010-6-14 08:47 编辑

Q29:

Smithtown
     University’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.
This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.
On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.
The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.


Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?


    A    Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
    B    This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
    C    This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
    D    The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.

E    More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.

这题答案是C。我选了个B。。。其实这题我不太读得懂题目意思。。哎。。求教牛牛们,这题如何推理呀~

收藏 分享

这是个A/C争议题

TOP

个人觉得是C。理由如下首先,要分清题目要你支持的是哪一方provides more support for the argument,说的是让你支持反对Smithtown
University’s fund-raisers的人。而不是去支持Smithtown
University’s fund-raisers。
A的话,支持了Smithtown
University’s fund-raisers。与题目要支持的相反。错

B的话,跟A同样的毛病。C的话,说大多数捐钱的,Smithtown
University’s fund-raisers,都没去联系过。反对Smithtown
University’s fund-raisers.也就是支持反对Smithtown
University’s fund-raisers的人。

请NN指教

TOP

我也觉得是C.

多新的人捐钱才说明募捐成功,所以如果大部分捐款来自之前的捐款人,就说明募捐不成功.

文中结论是募捐不成功,若要支持该结论,则需要证明新的捐款人捐款占少或老的捐款人捐款占多.

A.学校找到很多新的捐款人 --> 削弱结论

B.新的捐款人捐款份额比老的多 --> 削弱结论

C.大部分捐款都是来自老的 --> 支持结论.

TOP

哦~明白了~原来已经有前人讨论过了~gwd版本不一样竟然没找到。。多谢上面几位好人~

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看