OG11紫色63题

applejsjs

63．Certain pesticides can become ineffective if used repeatedly in the same place; one reason is suggested by the finding that there are much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in soils that are free of such chemicals．

(A)
Certain pesticides can become ineffective if used repeatedly in the same place；one reason is suggested by the finding that there are much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in soils that are free of such chemicals．

(B)
If used repeatedly in the same place，one reason that certain pesticides can become ineffective is suggested by the finding that there are much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in soils that are free of such chemicals．

(C)
If used repeatedly in the same place，one reason certain pesticides can become ineffective is suggested by the finding that much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes are found in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than those that are free of such chemicals．

(D)
The finding that there are much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in soils that are free of such chemicals is suggestive of one reason，if used repeatedly in the same place，certain pesticides can become ineffective．

(E)The finding of much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in those that are free of such chemicals suggests one reason certain pesticides can become ineffective if used repeatedly in the same place．

Logical predication

The sentence is correctly constructed；it has two independent clauses connected by a semicolon．If used repeatedly in the same place clearly and correctly modifies certain pesticides．

A
Correct．The sentence is correctly constructed；the modifier if used repeatedly in the same place is correctly placed．

B
If used repeatedly in the same place modifies one reason when it should modify certain pesticides．

C
If used repeatedly in the same place modifies one reason when it should modify certain pesticides；the relative clause following reason should be introduced by that．

D
If used repeatedly in the same place ambiguously modifies one reason when it should clearly modify certain pesticides．

E
The comparison the finding of much larger populations．．．than in those that is improperly constructed so that the meaning of the finding, or the research result．is distorted into that of the discovery；the relative clause following reason should be introduced by that．

The correct answer is A．

D的解释我有不理解的。为什么那样放就不能修饰ONE REASON了呢?依据是什么或者规律是什么?

EGHJUYMN

if used本来是应该修饰certain pesticides的，现在放这个地方既可以让人理解为修饰one reason，也可以理解为修饰certain pesticides，这样就使得表达含糊不清，所以排除。

wangliming

同意楼上的，状语从句放在当中可以修饰前面的也可以修饰后面的。


这么想也行， is suggestive of  没有动词 suggested好，不够简洁

xiaoyuexing

某牛人對D的解釋,但我還是不太懂...可以詳解?

fangzep

句子中間如果出現類似插入語形式的分詞結構，如果前後都有名詞，其修飾物件會有歧義.

xiaoyuexing

一啃再啃..我發現了..

one reason，if used repeatedly in the same place，certain pesticides can become ineffective．

if used repeatedly in the same place,    逗號前後都是N... 修飾會有歧義..