大全 196

piggycandys

196.        Camille Claudet worked continuously through the 1880’s and early 1890’s with the sculptor Auguste Rodin; since there are very few signed works of hers, the inescapable conclusion seems to be one of Claudet conceiving and executing part of Rodin’s enormous production of that period.

(A) inescapable conclusion seems to be one of Claudet conceiving and executing part of Rodin’s enormous production of that period

(B) conclusion of Claudet conceiving and executing part of Rodin’s enormous production of that period seems inescapable

(C) conclusion seems inescapable that part of Rodin’s enormous production of that period was conceived and executed by Claudet

(D) conclusion of part of Rodin’s enormous production of that period having been conceived and executed by Claudet seems inescapable（C）

(E) seemingly inescapable conclusion is that Claudet would have conceived and executed part of Rodin’s enormous production of that period

B选项为什么不对呢？我觉得很通顺啊！

LIANGSHAN

B项造成歧异

似乎是period seems inescapable，而不是 conclusion seems inescapable

susander

the [noun] of doing [o]是一种被og叫做convoluted。表达，经典的例子还有because of; in spite of， 这些词组都不能表达复杂的意思。其原因我想在于of这个介词之后只能跟一个名词性成分，如果把一个svo的谓语改称doing也不是名词性成分吧，读起来很累。再有，数数B有多少个of？这里没有平行结构嘛。A of B of C就可以算作错误标志了，这里还A of B of C of D， 欠妥……搂住你说呢？

还要说明的一点是也许搂主觉得C有被动不太好。但og对被动的诠释是“do not demonstrate that who exert the verb”,就是说不知道被动动作是谁发出的。C说清楚了by Claudet所以不算表达不清。当然，被动还是不被看好的，这里只想说明如果万般无奈不得不选被动，就给自己一个伤心的理由

sunniers

看不清楚句子成分的话，就先读句子的主干

        划线部分看主干：the  conclusion of Claudet seems inescapable

       楼主这样看清楚了吧

piggycandys

谢谢各位帮忙,再问个问题:

(C) conclusion seems inescapable that part of Rodin’s enormous production of that period was conceived and executed by Claudet中that后面这一串是修饰conclusion吗?是不是因为修饰语太长,作者把它置后了?

小娟子NUNU

My opinion on why (C) is a better choice over (B):
1. "conclusion of" in (B) is unidiomatic;
2. (C) has a better structure than (B).

EGHJUYMN

这是同位语从句吧。同位语从句可以不挨着修饰词是么？

liuzhenlin

这道题的非划线部分有...signed works of hers;  OG曾经说在 contemporaries of C's中 sth. of sb's是不好的结构，看来根本原因还是在逻辑意思上：contemporaries of C's 指的是C的contempories的contempories，而signed works of hers是指她的工作中的有记录的那部分。
或者说在of前或sb's后只要有一边有另一个限定成分，这个结构就可以接受，也就是说只有当‘sth of sb's’绝对的单独出现（前后都不能加东西哦~）才是错误的标志...
我说的对么？还请各位NN们指点呀～