91. Environmentalist: The commissioner of the Fish and
Game Authority would have the public believe that
increases in the number of marine fish caught
demonstrate that this resource is no longer
endangered. This is a specious argument, as unsound
as it would be to assert that the ever-increasing rate at
which rain forests are being cut down demonstrates a
lack of danger to that resource. The real cause of the
increased fish-catch is a greater efficiency in using
technologies that deplete resources.
The environmentalist’s statements, if true, best
support which of the following as a conclusion?
(A) The use of technology is the reason for the
increasing encroachment of people on nature.
(B) It is possible to determine how many fish are in
the sea in some way other than by catching fish.
(C) The proportion of marine fish that are caught is
as high as the proportion of rain forest trees
that are cut down each year.
(D) Modern technologies waste resources by
catching inedible fish.
(E) Marine fish continue to be an endangered
resource.
答案为E，我选了B
问题是，E的结论跳跃得也太大了，原题只反映了通过这种方法来判断不合理，并没有说这种鱼endangered了啊。请NN指教！
| 
