求infer 和indicate 区别。。

求大牛指点。。。

Interlinear notations such as
"copied"indicate that themanuscripts were discarded ones that had been replaced by freshly made ones.
Apparently, says Mr. Salomon, the monasterieshadwell-organized scriptoriums and large libraries even at that early stage.
我碰到的考题当中有一道是吧copied这个单词highlight了。然后问这个词为什麼要打引号。找到这篇文章就更好了，因为考试中的阅读题把这一段换了个形式表达，虽然也用引号强调了copied这个单词，但是并没有后面的indicate.而题目就是问“这个高亮的copied indicate了什麼？”找到原文的各位你们比我幸福太多，我是自己绞尽脑汁联系被改的体无完肤的上下文才选出“themanuscripts were discarded ones that had been replaced by freshlymade ones”，如果考试碰到这道infer题一定一定不要大错啦！送分的噢！
3p: interlinear notation of "copied" 的意思是说这个文献是一个被遗弃的文献，有一个replacemeng of 这个被遗弃文献，这种被遗弃并且replace的现象表明那个地方和年代就已经有了library system。也说明中国的很多佛教文献可能是在这里翻译的。（出题了，问interlinear notation infer了什么，我选的：表明了有library system那个选项，有一个选项是说infer 了这是个被replace过的，我觉得是干扰选项，因为interlinear notation的意思是被replaced过的，但是infer出了有library system，求考证）

这里到底是infer 了“有library system" 呢还是 infer 了 “that the manuscripts were discarded ones that had been replaced by freshly made ones.”

谢谢了！！