GMAT-OG12逻辑题推理过程-WEAKEN:削弱
1.
“Life expectancy” is the average age at death of the entire live-born population. In the middle of the nineteenth century, life expectancy in North America was 40 years, whereas now it is nearly 80 years. Thus, in those days, people must have been considered old at an age that we now consider the prime of life.
Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?
(A) In the middle of the nineteenth century, the population of North America was significantly smaller than it is today. (不相关:多个因素之一)
(B) Most of the gains in life expectancy in the last 150 years have come from reductions in the number of infants who die in their first year of life. (相关度大:确定)
(C) Many of the people who live to an advanced age today do so only because of medical technology that was unknown in the nineteenth century. (不相关:支持)
(D) The proportion of people who die in their seventies is significantly smaller today than is the proportion of people who die in their eighties. (不相关:支持)
(E) More people in the middle of the nineteenth century engaged regularly in vigorous physical activity than do so today. (相关度小:不确定)
分类:WEAKEN
看原文:
前提1(隐含假设):通常寿命集中于平均寿命附近
前提2(事实):平均寿命不同
总结论(推测):相同年龄的衰老程度不同
找答案:指出前提的具体性,从而否定一般性
TEST:否定前提,进而否定结论
模型或要素:平均寿命 = 年龄总和 / 总人口
考点:一般情况不一般;比较,找差异 |