返回列表 发帖

gwd-5-2

Q2:

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?

The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores. Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.

The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.

The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.

The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.

个人人为: d) 很牵强, 但又无更好的.........

收藏 分享

Why not B

TOP

d) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished 说, 木匠手艺越好, 楼越不易倒. 怎样weakens the guidebook writer?

(but: guidebook writer说, 由1930前 木匠造的楼更花功夫, 更有技术.)

还是我理解有误?

TOP

D要说的是作者看到的都是手艺好的木匠做的,那些手艺不好的早就被拆掉了(质量越好,被拆掉的可能性越小)。所以不能拿过去最好的和现在的多数比,然后就做出结论说过去的手艺比现在好,那是以偏概全
It is not only a test! It is Beyond GMAT!
Robert Zhou
http://weibo.com/irobert

TOP

以下是引用robert在2004-12-14 11:43:00的发言: D要说的是作者看到的都是手艺好的木匠做的,那些手艺不好的早就被拆掉了(质量越好,被拆掉的可能性越小)。所以不能拿过去最好的和现在的多数比,然后就做出结论说过去的手艺比现在好,那是以偏概全

thanks, i see

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看