GWD逻辑求解！谢谢~

citidandan

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff wew lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at market prices,more famers could profit by growing cashews.However,since all processing plants are in urban areas,removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce unemployment over the next five years.


求削弱：
A.Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastic.
B.Other countries in which cashews are processed subsdize their prcessing pants.
C.Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kerland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
D.More people in Kerland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
E.A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small famers in Kerland off their land and into the cities.



希望高手解题的同时能把句子翻译出来。谢谢~

sbjqbS

民工进城应该表明即使关税还在，民工们还是干不了因为没钱挣，则processing plants更加没钱挣了，民工们都进城了，加工厂的工人们就也本来差不多下岗了。所以移去关税不会使得本来就失业的工厂更加失业。所以E削弱。

citidandan

谢谢。

答案的确是E。

acrophobia

E

K对未加工的C的出口征高税，确保C卖给国内加工厂。如果取消关税，那么未加工C就能回到市场价格，更多农民会因为种植C获利。但C的加工厂都在市区，取消关税会阻碍政府降低失业率。

A 新信息by-products  无关
B 莫名牵扯其他样本Other countries 无关
C 加强，说明high关税有益加工厂
D 不能解释结论，不能加强，不能削弱
E 缺乏有利润的农作物迫使越来越多的农民离开土地进入城市，也就是不取消关税，城市失业率也会上升

piggycandys

某个地方对没有加工过的腰果的出口征以较高关税，这样来保证这些开心果被国内所用。如果取消这个关税，让未加工的开心果以公开市场价出售，这样可以让更多的种植腰果的农民从中获利。结论说，但是因为开心果的加工厂大部分在城市，所以取消关税阻碍了政府为降低未来五年城市失业率所做的努力。


潜在逻辑就是取消关税农民挣得多，但是会导致城市失业率高，所以不应当取消关税。

要weaken就要说不取消关税也会导致失业率。
不取消关税农民挣钱就少，一些人挣不到钱就去城市，城市这样的外来务工人员增多，失业率依旧增高。
异因同果的削弱。选E

不知道这样说对不对。