- 精华
- 7
- 积分
- 7744
- 经验
- 7744 点
- 威望
- 751 点
- 金钱
- 1758 ¥
- 魅力
- 1531
|
19.
题库: 43 AWA224-43 频率:1
原始狗:
zhaoyuangks
7.31
AA:University hospitals' quality of care is worse than private or community hospitals. Two reasons: first is that in the author's region, the university hospitals have 15% fewer doctors, 20% less success on caring of patients than private hospitals--somewhat statistics; Second reason is the author believes that the university hospitals doctors divide their time into conducting researchs, teaching students and taking care of patients.
都是很明显的逻辑漏洞。
The following appeared in an article in the health section of a newspaper.
“There is a common misconception that university hospitals are better than community or private hospitals. This notion is unfounded, however: the university hospitals in our region employ 15 percent fewer doctors, have a 20 percent lower success rate in treating patients, make far less overall profit, and pay their medical staff considerably less than do private hospitals. Furthermore, many doctors at university hospitals typically divide their time among teaching, conducting research, and treating patients. From this it seems clear that the quality of care at university hospitals is lower than that at other kinds of hospitals.”
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
报纸的健康板块上的文章:
有一种普遍的错误观念认为大学医院比社区或私人医院更好。这个想法是无根据的,我们地区的大学医院较之私人医院,少雇15%的医生,对患者的治愈率要低20%,总体利润要小得多,给一户员工的待遇比私人医院低很多。而且,很多大学医院的医生将他们的时间分为教学,直到研究和看病几部分。从此可明显看出大学医院的服务质量比其他医院低。
提纲:
1, 从一个医院的情况就推广到整个太草率
2, 治愈率低可能是因为接受的患者得的病都比较罕见等原因造成的
3, 工资低,总体利润低,时间分配给教学都不能一定说明质量差。可能其他福利好,接受的病人少,教学研究有助于进步
1. 首先,医生的人数与质量之间没有必然的因果原因。profit跟质量也无关系。很可能treating price is significantly lower。
2. 成功率不能说明问题。缺乏其他的证据,忽略了他因:比如因为质量高,所以很多serious illness的,而送往其他医院的一般都是common cases.
3. 时间不能代表问题。因为那些医生所做的研究很可能帮助他们进行治疗。 |
|