返回列表 发帖

OG13 CR89提问

89. Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?


(A) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support.
(B) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second states a contrary conclusion that is the main conclusion of the argument.
(C) The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion.
(D) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.
(E) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish

一直搞不懂这道题的conclusion是什么,个人总觉得是overoptimistic,但是看了解释,貌似完全错了,选的答案也和正确答案刚好相反。求指教
收藏 分享

先说一句,楼主你认为论述的结论是overoptimistic 是没有错的。


题意理解:
前提1:                自从银行高管买进自己银行的股份后
结论1:                担心银行资金即将出问题的存款人就放宽心了。
前提2:                因为既然银行高管对银行资金稳固这么有信心,那些银行资金会崩溃的谣言一定是假的。
反对结论1的评价:这个推理可能过于乐观了。
反前提1,2:          因为银行高管买进银行股份是有计划的,其目的就是为了消除负面的谣言。


关键点:论述的观点是什么——这个推理过于乐观了。


选项分析:


A 段一:支持一个结论的依据;                                段二:提出一个理由质疑这个依据。正确
B 段一:支持一个结论的依据;                                段二:与本段观点对立的结论。                           (段二不是个结论,是支持一个结论的依据。因此错。)
C 段一:提出支持文章观点的依据;                         段二:文章观点。(段一是支持反对文章观点的依据;段二不是个结论,是支持一个结论的依据。因此错。)
D 段一:描述了一个全文都在试图解释的条件;       段二:给出了本段文章试图确立(赞成)段一的一个解释。(段二没解释段一 ~)
E 段一:描述了一个全文都在试图解释的条件;       段二:提供了本文试图确立的对段一的解释的支持依据。(段二没解释段一 ~)

TOP

解释的不错。

TOP

先说一句,楼主你认为论述的结论是overoptimistic 是没有错的。


题意理解:
前提1:                 ...
konglxd 发表于 2013-4-16 21:39


你好~你关于D的解释我觉得有些不妥,请指正:


D 段一:描述了一个全文都在试图解释的条件;       段二:给出了本段文章试图确立(赞成)段一的一个解释(段二没解释段一 ~)


关于你的理由:红色部分我支持;蓝色部分我觉得应该为:段2解释了argument的conclusion(overoptimistic),这是argument想要establish的部分,你觉得呢?所以褐色部分我就觉得不需要解释了。

TOP

感谢!!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看