返回列表 发帖

gwd6-5

According to a theory advanced

by researcher Paul Martin, the wave

of species extinctions that occurred

Line in LACE w:st="on">North AmericaLACE> about 11,000 years

(5) ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era,

can be directly attributed to the arrival

of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who

were ancestors of modern Native

Americans. However, anthropologist

(10) Shepard Krech points out that large

animal species vanished even in areas

where there is no evidence to demon-

strate that Paleoindians hunted them.

Nor were extinctions confined to large

(15) animals: small animals, plants, and

insects disappeared, presumably not

all through human consumption. Krech

also contradicts Martin’s exclusion of

climatic change as an explanation by

(20) asserting that widespread climatic

change did indeed occur at the end of

the Pleistocene. Still, Krech attributes

secondary if not primary responsibility

for the extinctions to the Paleoindians,

(25) arguing that humans have produced

local extinctions elsewhere. But,

according to historian Richard White,

even the attribution of secondary

responsibility may not be supported

(30) by the evidence. White observes that

Martin’s thesis depends on coinciding

dates for the arrival of humans and the

decline of large animal species, and

Krech, though aware that the dates

(35) are controversial, does not challenge

them; yet recent archaeological

discoveries are providing evidence

that the date of human arrival was

much earlier than 11,000 years ago.

Which of the following is true about Martin’s theory, as that theory is described in the passage?

  1. It assumes that the Paleoindians were primarily dependent on hunting for survival.

  2. It denies that the Pleistocene species extinctions were caused by climate change.

  3. It uses as evidence the fact that humans have produced local extinctions in other situations.

  4. It attempts to address the controversy over the date of human arrival in LACE w:st="on">North AmericaLACE>.

  5. It admits the possibility that factors other than the arrival of humans played a role in the Pleistocene extinctions.

Can anyone help explain this question? I still think the answer should be A rather than B. Thanks.

收藏 分享

Pls refer to the highlighted parts:

According to a theory advanced

by researcher Paul Martin, the wave

of species extinctions that occurred

Line in LACE w:st="on">North AmericaLACE> about 11,000 years

(5) ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era,

can be directly attributed to the arrival

of humans,

Krech also contradicts Martin’s exclusion of

climatic change as an explanation by

(20) asserting that widespread climatic

change did indeed occur at the end of

the Pleistocene.

TOP

thanks   a    lot  !!!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看