返回列表 发帖

gwd-12-Q3

Were it not for the fusion-powered heat and radiation that rush from its core, instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse.



    A    instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse
    B     instead a star would have collapsed under its own weight
    C     a star would have to be collapsing under its own weight
    D    a star would collapse under its own weight

E    its own weight would have caused a star’s collapse

哪位好心人士,帮忙解释下,我选的是E,答案是D。 这道题一点头绪都没有

收藏 分享

虚拟语气
if +过去时, 主句用would、could

TOP

请教NN,B中的instead是怎么个错法?

TOP

Were it not (原语序:if it were notfor the fusion-powered heat and radiation that rush from its core, instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse.



A.instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse

B.instead a star would have collapsed under its own weight

C.a star would have to be collapsing under its own weight

D.a starwould collapse under its own weightwould对应if it were的虚拟语气的过去和过去将来时态;star collapse主动优于被动)

E.its own weight would have caused a star’s collapseit指代不明,逻辑上就是a star自己,但是语法上翻译出来就是:它自己的重量可能会导致一个星体爆炸。could have的虚拟语气对应于if it had been,错;cause a star’s collapse不好,cause a star to collapse更好)

TOP

这道题我之前看到一个大牛的解释就顿悟了:Were it not for不是一般的倒装,而是If it were not for的意思。

TOP

好像有点道理 

TOP

E似乎意思不大对……感觉像是把别的star collapse掉一样……

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看