返回列表 发帖

请教GWD11-Q30

Dear all,

WHY IS IT "C"?  Thanks for any help!

GWD11-Q30:

Editorial:
In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance.
To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply.
However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed.
Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.


Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

A.
The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.

B.
Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.

C.
People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.

D.
The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.

E.
People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.
收藏 分享

Conclusion:unemployed people will have no financial incentive ...

Evidence:supplement will not raise any worker’s income above ...

断桥削弱不可能,因为supplement will not raise...是一个Fact

他因削弱,别的原因导致people will have incentive

A:收税与否与题目无关,稍许加强

B:他国政策无关,对比项无关

C:有工作的人在找工作时倾向于得到报酬更高的工作,so人们会倾向于先找到一份工作因为1.至少和政府救济相比拿一样多的钱2.有可能找到报酬高于救济金的工作。他因削弱。也可以用否命题加强来检查

D:   人们接受到得救济金在政府定义的贫困线收入以下。即使找到一份工资与救济金相当的工作任然在贫困线以下,那为何还要找工作,稍许加强

E:sometimes是一个模棱两可的词汇,出现在答案中基本都错

TOP

得到救济金的没工作的人在贫困线以下,那么他们不去找工作吗? 这不就是很好的反驳吗?

你的逻辑很奇怪呢~ 选项里说的 是得到救济金的没工作的人在贫困线以下。  你从哪得到了工资和救济金相当呢?你怎么又知道救济金和工资加在一起还低于贫困线呢?

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看