返回列表 发帖

GWD-3-Q17:

1.
GWD-3-Q17:

Brochure:
Help conserve our city’s water supply.
By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use.
A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.



Criticism:
For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills.



Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?



    A    Even homeowners whose yards do not have water-conserving landscapes can conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes.
    B    A conventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure on fertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape.
    C    A significant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that do not have yards.
    D    It costs no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put in conventional landscaping.

E    Some homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all other purposes combined.

不理解啊,为什么选B

还有这个题目,到底是支持还是反驳?

收藏 分享

got it,thanks a lot

TOP

是反驳Criticism,即支持Brochure。

B说把传统的园艺环境改成有储水功能的不单节省水费,还省下了肥料和杀虫剂的钱。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看