返回列表 发帖

gwd-12-Q3

Were it not for the fusion-powered heat and radiation that rush from its core, instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse.



    A     instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse
    B     instead a star would have collapsed under its own weight
    C     a star would have to be collapsing under its own weight
    D     a star would collapse under its own weight

E     its own weight would have caused a star’s collapse

哪位好心人士,帮忙解释下,我选的是E,答案是D。 这道题一点头绪都没有。

收藏 分享

回复 1# brucechung2011


    这是虚拟语气的一种,从句中“were”提示主句要表示与现在的事实相反,用should(第一人称)/would(第二、三人称)/could/might + 动词原形。

TOP

E似乎意思不大对……感觉像是把别的star collapse掉一样……

TOP

好像有点道理 

TOP

这道题我之前看到一个大牛的解释就顿悟了:Were it not for不是一般的倒装,而是If it were not for的意思。

TOP

请教NN,B中的instead是怎么个错法?

TOP

虚拟语气
if +过去时, 主句用would、could

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看