- 精华
- 2
- 积分
- 2676
- 经验
- 2676 点
- 威望
- 242 点
- 金钱
- 683 ¥
- 魅力
- 440
|
85. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the method used to counter the automakers’ current position?
A. The automakers’ premises are shown to lead to a contradiction.
B. Facts are mentioned that show that the automakers are relying on false information.
C. A flaw is pointed out in the reasoning used by the automakers to reach their conclusion.
D. A comparison is drawn between the automakers’ current position and a position they held in the past.
E. Evidence is provided that the new emissions legislation is both economically feasible and environmentally necessary.
The automakers use the reason that these new restrictions would be overly expensive. However, in the past, the automakers previously also used the same reason and their position is proved to be wrong. Consequently the passage draws a comparison, that is, an analogy to disprove the reasoning of the automakers. Thus, D, a comparison is drawn between the automakers’ current position and a position they held in the past, is the most accurate and thus the best choice.
A. The automakers’ premises are not shown to lead a contradiction. Actually if the premises are true, they support their standing point.
B. There is no fact to show that the automakers are relying on false information.
C. The automakers’ reasoning itself does not contain error. The reasoning could only be shown not correct when confronted with past case.
E. There is no evidence that is provided for such purpose here in the passage.
86. Which one of the following, if true, lends the most support to the automakers’ current position?
A. The more stringent the legislation restricting emission becomes, the more difficult it becomes for automakers to provide the required technology economically.
B. Emissions-restriction technology can often be engineered so as to avoid reducing the efficiency with which an automobile uses fuel.
C. Not every new piece of legislation restricting emission requires new automotive technology in order for automakers to comply with it.
D. The more automobiles there are on the road, the more stringent emission restrictions must be to prevent increased overall air pollution.
E. Unless forced to do so by the government, automakers rarely make changes in automotive technology that is not related to profitability.
The automakers’ currently contends that these new restrictions would be overly expensive. If the situation is still the same, if there is no increased difficulty for the automakers to reach the difficulty, the reason here mentioned by them would be simply a scapegoat here for them to escape the necessary effort. However, if the truth is as said in choice A, the more stringent the legislation restricting emission becomes, the more difficult it becomes for automakers to provide the required technology economically, which means that because the current situation asks for even more advanced technology and the increased difficulty could not be overcome economically, the protest of the automakers is well supported.
B. actually weakens the automakers’ current position
C. it has nothing to do with supporting the automakers’ current position. Actually this claim could only express that the automakers do not need to protest that much.
D. If provided together with other information, such as “there are more and more cars on the roads”, the claim of D could serve as a weakening the automakers’ current position.
E. It only makes clear about why necessary for government to intervene and how to realize the plan about reducing the air pollution; in fact, it does not weaken or strengthen the automakers’ current position. |
|