一道来自曼哈顿的题，求指点！！

jssqzgring

Curbing government spending has been demonstrated to raise the value of a
country's currency over time. However, many economists no longer recommend
this policy. A currency of lesser value causes a country's exports to be more competitive
in the international market, encouraging domestic industries and making
the economy more attractive to foreign investment.
The statements above most strongly support which of the following inferences?
(A) Limited government spending can also lead to a reduction in the national
deficit.
(B) Curbing government spending can make a country's exports less competitive.
(C) Many economists now recommend higher levels of government spending.
(D) An increase in the value of a currency will result in reduced government
spending.
(E) Competitive exports indicate a weak currency

我来写一下逻辑链哈
1.curb spending 推 currency value rise
2.currency of lesser value 推 more competitive exports

这是两个原命题，原命题呢又和逆否命题是等价的。而B选项中，逻辑链是 curb spending 推currency value rise 推 less competitive exports。 这不是明显的2的否命题吗？？？原命题和否命题并不等价啊！！
currency value下降有出口更加competitive，并不能推出currency value上升 有出口less competitive啊！！！

求NN指导！！！

lanshi

和LZ想的一模一样！！！同问~~~

anilolive

这道题问的是： most strongly support 而不是must be true,所以选项中的所有都有一定的推测因素在，并不是潜在的事实。
在mamhattan中的原文解释里有提到，正确选项B中有can，所以相比同样较好的备选E来说，更恰当
A选项提到新概念deficit 排除
C选项 无关
D选项 正好与原文相反

jssqzgring

不都是归纳题嘛？？有区别？

Cherliuiking

more...more...这种说法，就等于说这两个变量是正相关的。既然如此，逆命题、否命题、逆否命题就全部成立了。