返回列表 发帖

ff135-45

45. Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.
This reasoning in the commissioner’s argument is flawed because this argument
A.    relies on information that is far from certain
B.    confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution
C.    inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts
D.    inappropriately employs language that is vague
E.    takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds
       请问this plan(decrease expenditures)原本应该是一个必要条件还是一个充分条件?
收藏 分享

Premise: The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year.

The plan is a sufficient condtion to decrease spending.

Conclusion: We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

The plan is a necessargy conclution to decrease spending.

B

TOP

谢谢!懂了

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看