哪儿位大哥能帮我看看这两道lsat逻辑题

wadwang

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.

17. Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?

(A) The arts of life have no useful end.

(B) The artificial is not better than the natural.

(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature.

(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated.

(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature.

18. If the author’s argument were challenged on the grounds that the construction of buildings has adverse effects on the natural environment, which of the following replies might the author use to respond to the challenge logically?

(A) There are human activities, such as making music, that are environmentally harmless.

(B) Harming the environment is not an end, of purpose, of the arts of life.

(C) The construction could involve the use of natural, not artificial, materials.

(D) Constructing buildings is not an “art of life.”

(E) Even if the natural environment is disturbed by the construction of buildings, it is improved for human use.
我读不懂题
谢谢
[em25][em25][em25][em25][em25]

wadwang

谢谢，不过答案我有，能不能帮我解释一下

kanecao

译文：
If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.
如果说人工的东西不如自然的东西的话，那么生活中形形式式的艺术又如何解释呢？挖掘，犁刨，建造和穿着衣服，所有这一切不都是与追随自然的要求相反吗？

作者用"挖掘，犁刨，建造和穿着衣服，所有这一切不都是与追随自然的要求相反吗？"来反对"人工的东西不如自然的东西"的观点，即作者认为：人工的东西比自然的东西要好。

因此，C，E作为答案没问题。