求指点feifei logic 73

DmsCyyS

73. There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific findings, namely, the replication of results by other scientists. Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientists, which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results.



Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?



A.Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated.

B.Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication.

C.Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication.

D.In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.

E.Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.

答案是A，看不懂。。。求指点！多谢！

bradfordchen

一语惊醒梦中人啊

DmsCyyS

谢谢啦~

kittycd

这个题的意思是有人说科学报告发表之前是不要官方验证的，因为有错误的或者不准确的研究成果不会有很坏的影响，给出的原因是说成果里的问题会被后人发现。

a选项说科学实验要n多年才会有人去重复，而在这n多年里面，大家都理所当然认为这个结论是正确的，所以是有坏影响的。