返回列表 发帖

求助OG12逻辑第63题

When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist,
they reply, “No.” Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are
dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation
described above?
(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, “Yes”?
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?
谁能帮我解释一下为什么选A 呢?
收藏 分享

文中的意思是说,被催眠的人听到别人问他听不听得见,他们都回答听不见。
如果按照专家认为的,被催眠者的回答是由
1)觉得自己是聋的那一部分回答的,那么回答者就应该不能回答(听不到问题)
2)觉得自己不是聋的那一部分回答的,那么回答者就应该回答回答听得到(不是聋的一部分告诉自己听得到)

所以如果按照专家的想法,分成两部分回答,那么要么回答YES,要么不回答...

但是我觉得D也是削弱,因为如果分成两部分回答,就应该回答YES或者不回答,为什么他们都回答NO呢??

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看