一道逻辑题 求助

卮言浅夏

Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that

his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate

predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence,

Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.

Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not a responsible psychologist,

Dr. Ladlow’s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct.

Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.

101. Anson bases his conclusion about Dr. Ladlow on which one of the following?

A. an attack on Dr. Ladlow’s character

B. the application of a general principle

C. the use of an ambiguous term

D. the discrediting of facts

E. the rejectiion of a theoretical explanation

请问答案是哪个？谢谢

painstak

我觉得是A。

因为Anson的结论是Dr. Ladlow is not a responsible psychologist。只是从这个角度来说，A是对的。从其他方面来看，Responsible psychologist always......表示他如果称职的话，他应该接受一些特殊情况发生的可能性，不能过于肯定自己的结果。

这个答案只是我自己推断出来的。我也不能保证是否正确，我只能给你提供一种思路。

fangzep

这个是费费逻辑里面的.....找不到答案

jiuwang

B

因为最后一句话说：Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect

这是我的理解