返回列表 发帖

OG12 阅读第3题的疑问

P359
问题是
The passage implies that which of the following is a possible consequence of a company's adoption of innovations that increase its ecoefficiency?
答案是B, Company growth fostered by cost savings from such innovations may allow that company to manufacture a greater number of products that will be used and discarded,thus worsening environmental stress.
但是文章6~12行说的很清楚,Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured ...
还请指导下
收藏 分享

1,Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured ...
这句是说应用这些innovations可以减少生产时带来的浪费
2,Company growth fostered by cost savings from such innovations
这是说当公司已经从这样的innovations中减少成本从而成长了之后

1在实施的时候本身不会导致the number of products increase,但1经过施行可以产生2,2会导致公司生产更多。(company growth了,产量也会提高)

TOP

这道题我不知道A选项为什么错了

(A)    Company profits resulting from such innovations may be reinvested in that company with no guarantee that the company will continue to make further improvements in ecoefficiency.

文章说:“Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways” ,我感觉这个跟A选项是一样的呀!

TOP

是不是文中强调的是similarly,而A选项中强调的是further improvements

TOP

个人感觉是因为文中说的是industries,而选项说的是company~~根据OG解释,这种改变代

表着company会abandon ecoefficiency,而ecoefficiency是可以带来利益的,所以不可以推断

company会abandon ecoefficiency。嘿嘿,这是我的感觉哈:)希望能够有帮助,如果理解错

了,请大家指出哈

TOP

我也很疑惑,请牛人帮忙

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看