关于sdcar2010的逻辑总结运用问题—OG上BF类题目分析
看了sdcar2010的帖子，写的真的很精彩。我看完一章再总结OG上的题目，今天看到BF。被一道OG题目困惑了，冒昧请求您帮忙解答一下。
79. In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in
automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in
countries where whiplash is not covered. Presently, no objective test for whiplash exists, so it is true that
spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. Nevertheless, these facts do not warrant the
conclusion drawn by some commentators that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash
injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious. Clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not
include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that
they actually have suffered.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
(A) The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.
(B) The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is
that conclusion.
(C) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further
evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
(D) The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is a claim presented in
order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding. Answer-[D]
(E) The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to
establish that the finding is accurate.
这题中，conclusion是什么？按照OG的解释，clearly后面的是推翻前面的解释。但我觉得把它看成main conclusion也行啊？前面的当成所有原因。能帮忙分析下吗？真的十分感谢。
我能通过第一个黑体排除A,B。然后认为claim和conclusion在这里是一样的，所以在C、D里选答案。可是也觉得第一个黑体是一个finding,那么应该也是一个evidence啊。前面你也说了evidence可以是一个observations等等，我觉得这个finding也就是evidence.
那么到底是第二个黑体是不是结论的问题，还是第一个黑体是evidence或finding的问题呢？ |
