请牛牛帮忙翻译一下,powerscore里的一道平行推理题

tulip37

这个题干,看了很多遍不明白,就觉得矛盾,可是书上解释说2个前提单独都能推出结论,拜托给我这个好学的孩子一点提示吧,(胸闷了好久),万分感谢!
5. No one in the French department to which Professor Alban belongs is allowed to teach more than one introductory level class in any one term.  Moreover, the only language clases being taught next term are advanced ones.  So it is untrue that both of the French classes Professor Alban will be teaching next term will be introductory level classes.  

The pattern of reasoning displayed in the argument above is most closely paralleled by that in which one of the following arguments?
(A) The Morrison Building will be fully occupied by May and since if a building is occupied by May the new tax rates apply to it, the Morrison Building will be taxed according to the new rates.
(B) The revised tax code does not apply at all to building built before 1900, and only the first section of the revised code applies to buildings built between 1900 and 1920, so the revised code does not apply to the Norton Building, since it was built in 1873.
(C) All property on Overton Road will be reassessed for tax purposes by the end of the year and the Elnor Company Headquarters is on Overton Road, so Elnor's property taxes will be higher next year.
(D) New buildings that include public space are exempt from city taxes for 2 years and all new buildings in the city's Alton District are exempt for 5 years, so the building with the large public space that was recently completed in Alton will not be subject to city taxes next year.
(E) Since according to recent statute, a building that is exempt from property taxes is charged for city water at a special rate, and hospitals are exempt from property taxes, Founder's hospital will be charged for city water at a special rate.

tulip37

谢谢你帮我鉴定我的翻译

LoveY

我认为你对两个前提的翻译是对的，答案是选择D吧？因为D中也是给两个前提，并且这两个前提都能独立地推出结论

tulip37

Nice to meet you, sdcar2010, 看过你很多精辟的指导贴,"万种风情"的头像,猜猜你大概是个男生,还是个喜好美女之人,are you?

可不可以帮我看看我的蹩脚翻译和解题思路对不对？
No one in the French department to which Professor Alban belongs is allowed to teach more than one introductory level class in any one term.  Moreover, the only language clases being taught next term are advanced ones.  So it is untrue that both of the French classes Professor Alban will be teaching next term will be introductory level classes.
前提1：没有人可以被允许 在有教授A的法语系 教多过一个的 (在任何学期) 入门级班--------结论说教授A可以教2个入门级班是不对的，是能够在这里被单独支持的

前提2：甚至，下学期教的唯一的语言是高级的（语言）--------结论说教的是入门级，和这里的高级矛盾了，所以不对，在这里也是能够被单独支持的
结论：所以，这个事实是不对的，即下学期教授A会教的2个法语班将是入门级班

请指点！

honoluluhono

Logic of the stimulus: No person can have more than ONE

SPECIAL thing. All things available are NOT special.

Therefore, it is wrong to say that a person can have TWO

special things. Basically, the stimulus gives two good

premises, anyone of which would lead to its main conclusion.
A) A building is special. If any building is special, then

it will have B. Therefore, that building will have B. Wrong.
B) Condition A does not apply to building with condition B.

Only part of condition A applies to buildings not with

condition B. A building has condition B. Therefore,

condition A does not apply. Wrong.
C) All buildings on location A will be re-evaluated.

Building B is on location A. Therefore, tax for building B

will be higher next year. Wrong.
D) All buildings with condition A are exempt. All buildings

in area B are exempt. Therefore, a building with condition A

and in area B will be exempt. Correct.
E) If a building has condition A, then it is specially

charged for water. If a hospital, then it has condition A.

Therefore, a specific hospital is specially charged for

water. Wrong.

tulip37

有没有宁能帮忙翻译一下题干的啊?  

No one in the French department to which Professor Alban belongs is allowed to teach more than one introductory level class in any one term.  Moreover, the only language clases being taught next term are advanced ones.  So it is untrue that both of the French classes Professor Alban will be teaching next term will be introductory level classes.