给非N的awa常用词汇

myice

我是一个写作非N，而且我申请的学校对AWA没有要求，自定目标4分，所以复习时就自由散漫了。结果今天拿到成绩居然拿到5，我很欣慰。
) D) v' L' Q& c  K5 B; g# @5 J+ q- W9 C0 z4 c# Z
现在分享一下我在准备awa是总结的一些高频词汇， 心往能够抛砖引玉，对各位筒子们有所帮助+ K7 Z1 v. t3 V( v: ~) {7 Q
8 h; c* y' h8 z; Y8 ]% b# t
P1
& ]" U9 i# u+ i5 G$ g( a
* w9 @" d2 Z0 [6 T; [: s! h: H6 I6 V( _: Q) p' Q

! H+ P" @' v7 {7 C/ ^7 fIndispensable( T" ^6 s% M' K3 u# U* v  y) [! S) y
9 Y5 h: f' T+ s7 H1 H
1 Q5 y; b% h3 R2 u, Y# \4 H
9 j% ]+ I8 E3 ~/ \8 F7 F
Undeniably% i" L0 i" e$ x" v
8 f0 a9 |6 j5 i5 Q/ v' R
' Z- u( L  Q# F

$ d, w' d& H$ q% z( r# _* `0 R4 rInevitably
- t- N2 Y2 j$ c3 u! M
5 ?* v. `% I( d; {! ^. `' U/ p- E4 S
5 D( c. W$ K1 K; f
consequently
; g& m1 V* y$ K
/ N% k1 T% _$ J6 i2 o% ^! u1 t6 t6 c/ O: R
, C; ]2 R, M5 F: v
* }/ `. r2 ^5 d1 \6 e: RApparently# A1 `* Y0 K5 v, S4 d5 g" j
; ?( p4 v$ R: K5 g2 ?: Y
/ p6 L8 R3 _# B" I4 p

, ^6 \+ ]" U- H/ G7 u* Htremendous: L  n( h5 H2 I! |& _) H
+ e# c6 A3 n1 W/ W

) c2 C8 F2 @/ C7 h. x
6 C9 n  X7 @% F" Z! C1 Himposing- K- k# m; y$ @0 d' f4 N

* I  u0 K) J+ ^5 ]" V. F) {3 u- c! t6 w7 N

/ D9 S, x6 N/ t; U6 qevidently# q. `& ~$ j, ^, r
4 ~' t+ d, j1 l- N& N( l
$ v( \: ?! L, N  h$ l

$ L2 G+ v, A1 m3 Dinformative
- r& L) o9 ~  A6 u; P
) Q- _" ]6 t0 ]5 b
! z8 Z( F& ?! S$ _; K
* F) {+ |) Q* y3 Lvalidity2 ?6 }$ p* W' {
; J4 N. c9 s. ]+ c5 T+ K

+ W6 O% J; ]0 S
* e, J" c. b8 `) Gcredibility
3 u1 ~% O* i; L4 ]7 ^; _
0 P) E: {+ w# O" |
5 B; P2 q* P2 A1 C
9 {" ?4 j' T1 g/ Z0 d, tprecise
3 F7 {% e, R6 [* t3 h' p0 ?' ]3 u: I0 c3 q9 B

" _! k+ u& i: i+ n5 o; d
% r2 H0 E4 J8 @- f% N6 Zon balance5 X) a9 f2 K, r3 o, Z

' @7 }/ f! }+ v# b: E+ S5 s
0 n; f4 B" c* }+ P- q" x* v& {. ]
: \7 \$ c+ g7 ~" p/ ]admittedly
- [7 f, j  ~4 h3 s. V: s- S1 e/ V) S0 p( V) ~1 [
& X& V; h# A2 {! H# r4 d( `

; x( D) y) O# ]- l. H, {8 B( `% Cpersuasive/ z& U  J" B8 n7 A1 A5 P
. T; F% Z3 }; P& n+ x
! Y2 K* n$ k  _4 U3 s  j
( D0 j! P5 S3 y! w2 C; C$ I9 c
conspicuously / P0 V9 b- d" F! h* A# d

  J+ a0 ]% k* ^2 ^, I  c
4 c- b5 J' Z3 T+ E
1 V8 U7 [- S% H9 B: |1 [. a( Xentirely- g7 Y! |( P/ P! p5 r; `: r8 r
  / h# A! K: [' Z, z

" [: s+ b) F4 F3 @) s1 C# o! I3 w! Q% |( ~! V' R8 [; p
undoubtedly

myice

P26 Q; m' U- e8 h& W; t  m
4 B! o! @+ L+ _: M7 L4 S1 ?2 {
/ J6 B/ x% O' V/ P: G
) t; a( N+ W$ e4 ]# `; u4 v; A
Moreover
8 S: w9 c( ?* X
% C; V& U0 C- J+ W- W- U. m: Q( P8 d2 c4 t' [: @" o

1 c, U& q1 L& F6 q5 cnevertheless
& H' O  I: {( D* D
# k8 y/ ?1 c0 _% \  L5 `3 @0 B
$ z6 z% d0 i" N! t2 _
- e, M% W6 g6 lUltimately
" y, N% j4 a$ L+ C5 c) \" b: d
2 q, g+ ]1 {3 z3 Q4 R- F9 Q
. G7 A! Q# l# E7 C9 V" p0 p9 D
5 l3 ]8 R7 }0 P; t8 c& U# `by the same token
8 |" `" v9 D$ `! ~+ {1 Y
7 o5 ]- J. t2 T# m5 k5 C6 w! r: l: N- F2 M4 V
8 G3 \" Q  ]- w* B
in light of $ @% s2 c, U) |# j- [4 J

, p+ ]5 L9 ]2 G5 Y7 ^
* c2 ?% p5 L3 q) s, S. {
+ d+ Q/ l  e4 H9 `, f) zConstitute sufficient evidence
+ a+ H3 Y4 Z9 Y1 |( z. J5 o- F9 W0 a5 t0 u/ T

* e- a" S" \8 {2 x; i$ }9 {1 H( u
) D+ k) B# T4 uGiven the matters discussed above
; c9 X1 l. r) _8 Y
4 c% V& ^3 t: q3 n4 V  O: t( R! S6 M! ]- q" W$ k; b/ q& m, c6 |

# }5 w' A6 E  ~9 nThis argument is not persuasive as it stands
2 p: l9 G- v% X) Y5 N
( g# \/ t3 q( O' o
5 a$ u& `  Y# C( g
% Y5 ~2 K7 G0 Q2 e' f- T) B8 @xx is unsounded to establish a general conclusion& N: e8 a1 x# C  u2 f

* M7 O( m/ K. v0 F: f/ M+ X  R6 y! j) {7 o! V) A
1 Q+ ]. `1 A6 h+ S. c; G
it is judicious to admit point of the issue even though such point may suffer from some explicit shortcoming
- S- [+ |0 F, `3 M/ B5 @$ k; F: l$ |) c% M
% e7 e* E0 j4 U3 m0 T
1 Q6 V* `8 o0 {3 Z! c, J) n+ r2 c8 s$ {2 x

- }% ~) y  F  r* ~  j# `4 Y
; G6 e1 ~  b' a0 g3 ]; Y6 D# E5 i5 @: X* L3 v  {. o

2 ?* ]: I# N% ~. t8 EP3
3 J4 S1 H& g! x( ^+ q( m& Z9 q- q3 H- U

" q; v4 W; g6 ^* M6 c  L# ^% o. L% V7 x3 J" }) p7 b
Erroneous
( d0 B' [' ^$ C7 l: d
# ]: P' D! a& g6 E, s% n: E6 f9 ]: `; C

7 p2 z$ s( T) X! z3 @( Q% omerely3 }, s% d, [) h2 o( X  }
2 E7 H- }0 `8 y3 {6 Z

' h# ~' U) y' k2 l/ b! _
3 F5 A4 _5 P* s+ woverwhelming
* `. n5 f& C5 i( q- e; h0 z1 Y/ x) Q  `3 k+ ]3 x

. f0 }  n# m* M* Y5 A" q- P
# Q' `) B2 d6 ]! k( S. Usuperficial; q" @- U/ E2 U& }

* x/ p+ r( `* D( J( y
+ P( V! B3 x6 `5 ~+ R5 ^, u% S5 S* @/ l6 P* w. K" M4 T7 c, e; P
omit) ]0 U9 r0 X5 }. u- I/ f- X
; X; r9 [2 X3 J. w4 @

7 P' b4 h- i$ Z, c. z) B2 M& U  c# R/ E% A5 H8 H3 I9 K0 Z" x2 s
nullify
8 u+ S/ Q+ E9 P2 c5 D( p3 L3 r( j* E; d# P" T

4 T/ g  Q* L2 S. n4 h1 J- c1 m0 |2 V( c  v7 Q
overstate
8 ?" `% D; M, C. E1 V; j
+ m) B7 w% ~# t. F6 V/ ], c3 D  m4 g
7 C  t: P  J* h: M1 A) A
drawback
# S$ J1 Q& s& U, ^$ C$ b8 ^- K! ]$ I; G1 V+ Z' C3 i2 I
) G% L/ g% m3 a& Y  c
- O( L; c/ ?3 P
gratuitous, o- z: H! d+ ?$ A7 `( f4 m# g9 n

7 V1 I; k+ d( l7 n4 c
' D- w6 K2 ^0 L0 |  N6 x. x, p3 @3 r" @1 O
neglect' @( C3 o7 _$ G1 a
4 c/ K$ l0 b  w. F
' _2 y% C) s- B& b5 N2 ]
) |9 ~, [* k! s* p
lose sight of
. k+ r' q' l( j4 ?. k( a. Y) D- A6 y1 x" @% q" V3 H, t
# O' W7 _# J/ Q: m! z( T- W
' _4 J4 @; i8 @4 j9 E- F" s
skeptical+ W2 F* g& q- c- l, s- |0 r

; T( b1 a7 X3 C# y( e% a
1 B) j4 r- [/ |$ j9 W/ e
% n" m9 D8 {: I1 O! b( fexaggerate
4 Y' \7 Z7 g" l( R6 a) o( V8 `6 S. |. k9 y

( X# X5 |0 G5 U! a/ ~
) K, g. K8 g3 Q# ~) efallacy, fallacious8 F/ }. P% X5 A+ w

, G1 m- J* S5 m9 z1 q% D; q: U. w; q! d" S8 ?9 i

1 l& L: \; h% Y% G* n# Scoincide
  N" J/ f' p1 M! h
( \4 M& H' ]. D6 e
; ~0 v7 E$ @4 y+ d/ R& ]/ V. R
vague
' _& W* D& j7 p5 S) C
+ n7 c' p& ~, J, s' Z! _
, A' j$ ?+ X: g9 t
. V: R( m7 a1 w" D& Dimcompatible
! ^+ X% k, ~! k+ e. s
: K* H; J7 Z; D* U3 h% }8 e5 T. _& d3 m8 U% o8 f4 g2 h; X

2 I% u! K1 }8 C# t* e% s  Y8 Funwarranted
: Y: g7 t" W7 c4 {" p# g2 ^
6 ~- g" R- K6 X- o7 Z
6 G2 H/ A- w% m% C- M
: [3 c( q! q9 P9 k, M3 u8 adissimilarity
! T6 m+ R- u9 V

myice

P4
6 C% N0 q) _7 g
3 I& y- b5 P5 c7 bjustify, justification7 M. v) K7 B! u8 c) Z# ?: v- M

5 Y( {/ [4 z) v( b+ E& H/ r; j0 h( O4 k' Z

3 u- z- i& {# e6 I/ zdemonstrate: ]4 f6 m  S* n! t$ A: [

- z- E* g* C! {4 i
/ \9 {4 o/ O6 X6 A' f- |
, E2 r, z4 X9 L2 kindicate
1 {; \! A1 h: f& t8 r1 n. l/ a2 ~/ P, J/ n

8 t6 w( {# d! T; R9 j! c- e3 t$ {
buttress: j  x5 b( I- w/ Y, N2 s) Y
- P  z5 L; M$ D' X" O5 I2 k% s4 F* M
% J$ u. v# |# F" e

3 C' b- ~5 C+ t$ `outweigh
) Y. ?8 d0 f, O+ K( h' x9 `- E; ~& m. ^" \9 P" Y3 B5 l
, \! W* M! f$ \' M) R' i9 y' F- H, Z! K
, j  @0 o$ V5 L. V8 r, p- S" L: V; x
allege& a+ Y% s! K3 S$ j

7 i' b5 G" [6 l! N1 A# w2 y" C4 a

+ b$ K' d/ W9 u1 pendorse
$ s* ~6 J& j# V$ n! Y! |) J2 x! m3 Z8 T

2 q0 J, D( [2 Y7 z
) p8 Y" r% p2 ?5 Gsubstantiate
1 j) C! F1 v4 t: k$ o( ?5 X; U3 p

% i5 k" a  E5 l+ M) D8 X* Y9 s7 R6 y
) Y( T+ w  n6 i+ B$ Lcausality, causal relationship

YOUO

谢谢分享

capsicum

xiexie