请教LSAT 28－5

peiyangzhe

5. In defending the Hyperion School of Journalism from charges that its program is of little or no value to its students, the dean of the school pointed to this recent success in placing students: 65 percent of its graduates went on to internships or jobs in print or broadcast journalism. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the defense offered by the dean? (A) More than half of the school’s students came from jobs in journalism to improve their skills. (B) Some newspaper editors do not regard journalism school as a necessary part of the training of a journalist. (C) The number of cities with more than one major newspaper has declined sharply over the last 25 years. (D) The program offered by the Hyperion School of Journalism is similar in quality and content to those offered by its peer institutions. (E) The proportion of applicants to the Hyperion School of Journalism that are admitted is lower than it was the years ago. 这题我觉得没有答案耶，为啥选A

diatomss

这题的样式有点像最近考到的那些很绕的 weaken 题型. 看来做做 LSAT 是有点用.

A 是对的因为.

题目说明了两件事.

1. hyperion school of journalism 对 students 没用

2. dean 说有用的原因是大部分学生都在毕业后找到journalism related jobs

答案也正说明了两件事

1. 学生是去improve skill 的. 所以有没有用应该是以有没有improve skill 而言. 而不是从有没有找到job 来说

2. 如果说找到 journalism related job 是skills 有improve 的表现. 答案A所说明的第二件事刚好做出了反驳:　超过一半的学生以前就有　ｊｏｕｒｎａｌｉｓｍ　ｒｅｌａｔｅｄ　ｊｏｂｓ。　所以他们原本就有能力找到工作。　而不是”增加的ｓｋｉｌｌ”　的帮助。　所以不能推出ｓｋｉｌｌ　有　ｉｍｐｒｏｖｅ。

daoying

就是说找到工作和improve skill这对矛盾之间的关系的问题是么，问题的焦点是有用没用的标准，其他选项似乎就无关了