7月5日换题库了——7月GMAT作文新题汇总AA(1-11题)

underbab

1.argument是一篇editorial   说一个地区decades以来Citrus的价格涨了非常多，给出了一个柠檬涨价多少的数据。然后这里11年来只有过一次的unfavorable weather，然后好像没啥重要的了，就得出结论这样橘子的涨价要归咎于 growers。
（感谢chenr523
）

题库原题：89. The following is taken from an editorial in a local newspaper.

“Over the past decade, the price per pound of citrus fruit has increased substantially. Eleven years ago, Megamart charged 5 cents apiece for lemons, but today it commonly charges over 30 cents apiece. In only one of these last eleven years was the weather unfavorable for growing citrus crops. Evidently, then, citrus growers have been responsible for the excessive increase in the price of citrus fruit, and strict pricing regulations are needed to prevent them from continuing to inflate prices.”

范文：In this editorial the author argues for the imposition of strict pricing regulations in order to prevent citrus growers from continued inflation of prices of citrus fruit. The need for such regulation is supported by the author’s contention that citrus growers have been unnecessarily raising prices of citrus fruit in the past. The evidence for this allegation is the fact that the price of lemons at Megamart has increased from 15 cents per pound to over a dollar a pound during the preceding 11-year period. The author maintains that this increase is unjustifiable because weather conditions have been favorable to citrus production in all but one of those years. This argument is flawed for several reasons.

First and foremost, the author assumes that the only factor that influences the price of citrus fruit is the weather. Other factors such as monetary inflation, increased distribution and labor costs, or alterations in supply and demand conditions are completely ignored as possible sources for the increase. The charge that citrus growers have unnecessarily raised prices can be sustained only if these and other possible factors can be completely ruled out as contributing to the price increases. Since the author fails to address these factors, the recommendation calling for strict pricing regulations can be dismissed out of hand (adv. 无法控制, 脱手, 告终, 立即)
as frivolous.

Second, the author assumes that the only way to combat increased prices is through government intervention. In a free enterprise system many other means of affecting the pricing of goods are available. For example, boycotting a product and thereby influencing supply and demand conditions of the commodity is an effective means of influencing the price of the product. In a free market economy the call for price regulation by the government should occur only when all other means to rectify the problem have been exhausted.

In conclusion, the author’s argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument it would be necessary to show that the only factor influencing the price increases is the growers’ desire for increased profits.

underbab

2. argument 是Olympic Foods 那篇 因为color film processing 变得效率高了推出food processing 也会因为long experience 而minimize costs and maximize frofits。（感谢gmat新手22 ）

V2 aa：奥林匹克food（LZ再次内牛满面~~~）
感谢marshall10

题库原题：1. The following appeared as part of an annual report sent to stockholders by Olympic Foods, a processor of frozen foods.
“Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient. In color film processing, for example, the cost of a 3-by-5-inch print fell from 50 cents for five-day service in 1970 to 20 cents for one-day service in 1984. The same principle applies to the processing of food. And since Olympic Foods will soon celebrate its twenty-fifth birthday, we can expect that our long experience will enable us to minimize costs and thus maximize profits.”
范文：Citing facts drawn from the color-film processing industry that indicate a downward trend in the costs of film processing over a 24-year period, the author argues that Olympic Foods will likewise be able to minimize costs and thus maximize profits in the future. In support of this conclusion the author cites the general principle that “as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient.” This principle, coupled with the fact that Olympic Foods has had 25 years of experience in the food processing industry leads to the author’s rosy prediction. This argument is unconvincing because it suffers from two critical flaws.
First, the author’s forecast of minimal costs and maximum profits rests on the gratuitous assumption that Olympic Foods’ “long experience” has taught it how to do things better. There is, however, no guarantee that this is the case. Nor does the author cite any evidence to support this assumption. Just as likely, Olympic Foods has learned nothing from its 25 years in the food-processing business. Lacking this assumption, the expectation of increased efficiency is entirely unfounded.
Second, it is highly doubtful that the facts drawn from the color-film processing industry are applicable to the food processing industry. Differences between the two industries clearly outweigh the similarities, thus making the analogy highly less than valid. For example, problems of spoilage, contamination, and timely transportation all affect the food industry but are virtually absent in the film-processing industry. Problems such as these might present insurmountable obstacles that prevent lowering food-processing costs in the future.
As it stands the author’s argument is not compelling. To strengthen the conclusion that Olympic Foods will enjoy minimal costs and maximum profits in the future, the author would have to provide evidence that the company has learned how to do things better as a result of its 25 years of experience. Supporting examples drawn from industries more similar to the food-processing industry would further substantiate the author’s view。

underbab

3. 上月JJ9次~~~
No.53 The following editorial appeared in the Elm City paper.
“The construction last year of a shopping mall in downtown Oak City
was a mistake. Since the mall has opened, a number of local businesses have closed, and the downtown area suffers from an acute parking shortage, and arrests for crime and vagrancy have increased in the nearby Oak City Park. Elm City should pay attention to the example of the Oak City mall and deny the application to build a shopping mall in Elm City.” （52）(两个版本，此为较新版本)53. Elm城的报纸上的社论：
去年在橡树城市中心修建购物中心是个错误。由于中心开业，大量的本地企业倒闭了。而且市中心受到严重缺乏停车位的困扰。在附近的橡树城公园拘捕的罪犯和流浪汉也增加了。榆树城应该注意橡树城购物中心的例子并防止在榆树城建立购物中心。
非常感谢luckyxmx 提供这么好的原始材料~~~：）
没有这道新题的范文，下面先附上老版本的题目和范文
“The construction of last year of a shopping mall in downtown Oak City has done little for the residents of the community. Since the mall has opened, a number of local businesses have closed, and the downtown area suffers from an acute parking shortage. In addition, because the mall’s owner lives in nearby Elm City, the profits derived from sales at the mall are not being returned to the community. These problems, coupled with the increase in trash and litter in nearby Oak City park, demonstrate that Oak City did not use good judgment in allowing the construction of the mall in the first place.”(老题)
In this editorial the author rebukes Oak City for allowing the construction of a new downtown shopping mall. Citing a number of problems that have occurred since the building of the mail, the author concludes that the residents of Oak City have not benefited from the mail and that Oak City exercised poor judgment in allowing the mail to be built. Among the problems cited by the author are the closure of local businesses, lack of parking in the downtown area, and increased trash and litter in a city park near the mall. Moreover, the author argues that profits derived from sales are not benefiting Oak City because the owner of the mall lives in another city. The author’s argument is problematic in several respects.
In the first place, the author assumes that addition of the new mall is the cause of the various problems cited. The only evidence offered to support this claim is that the construction of the mall occurred before these problems manifested themselves. However, this evidence is insufficient to establish the claim in question. A chronological relationship is only one of the indicators of a causal relationship between two events.
In the second place, the author has focused only on negative effects the mall has had on the city. A more detailed analysis of the situation might reveal that the positive benefits for the city far outweigh the problems on which the author focuses. For example, new jobs might have been created for the residents of Oak City, and tax revenues might have been increased for the city. Lacking a more comprehensive analysis of the impact of the mail on Oak City, it is presumptuous on the part of the author to conclude that Oak City’s decision to allow the mall to be built was incorrect.
In conclusion, the author’s argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to demonstrate that the construction of the mall caused the various problems mentioned. The author would also have to show that the negative effects of the project outweighed the positive effects.

LZ的新题思路：1.中心开业与本地企业倒闭之间没有必然的因果关系（causal oversimplification）
2.罪犯和流浪汉的增加可能是因为其他原因，比如失业率的上升。。。（感觉和第一点有点重复。。。）
3.缺乏停车位和中心的建立无关，问题可能本来就存在或者是车增加了

underbab

4. AA: 说不该为一个冰淇淋连锁在Frostbite这个小镇上计划新开的店提供贷款。理由是小镇以寒冷的冬季而闻名，而且低温天气对冰淇淋销售不利。其次尽管小镇有10，000人口，但是只有1个冰淇淋店。而且尽管没有竞争，这个唯一的冰淇淋店去年的销售降低了10%。
感谢jerryzx
题库原题：104. The following appeared as part of a memorandum from the loan department of the Frostbite National Bank.
“We should not approve the business loan application of the local group that wants to open a franchise outlet for the Kool Kone chain of ice cream parlors. Frostbite is known for its cold winters, and cold weather can mean slow ice cream sales. For example, even though Frostbite is a town of 10,000 people, it has only one ice cream spot — the Frigid Cow. Despite the lack of competition, the Frigid Cow’s net revenues fell by 10 percent last winter.”
范文：In this memorandum the loan department of Frostbite National Bank recommends against approval of a business loan to a local group that wants to open an ice cream parlor. In support of this decision the loan department points out that Frostbite has a reputation for cold winters and sales of ice cream decrease in cold weather. This latter point is buttressed by the fact that Frostbite’s only ice cream parlor suffered a 10 percent decline in net revenues the previous winter. The loan department’s decision is questionable for the following reasons.
To begin with, since it is reasonable to expect a decline in ice cream sales during winter months, it is difficult to assess the relevance of the fact that Frostbite has cold winters to the potential success of the Kool Kone franchise. Common sense suggests that this fact would be significant only if it turned out that Frostbite’s winter season lasted 9 or 10 months as it does in arctic regions. In that case slow sales could be expected for most of the year and the loan department’s opposition to the loan would be readily understandable. If, on the other hand, Frostbite’s winter season lasts only a few months and the remainder of the year is warm or hot, it is difficult to comprehend the loan department’s reasoning.
Next, the loan department assumes that the Frigid Cow’s decline in net revenue last winter was a result of slow sales occasioned by cold weather. While this is a possible reason for the decline, it is not the only factor that could account for it. For example, other factors such as poor business practices or lack of inventory could be responsible for the Frigid Cow’s loss of revenue. The loan department’s failure to investigate or even consider these and other possible explanations for the Frigid Cow’s decline in revenue renders their decision highly suspect.
In conclusion, the loan department’s decision is ill-founded. To better evaluate the decision, we would need to know more about the length and severity of Frostbite’s winter season. Moreover, evidence would have to be provided to support the assumption that the Frigid Cow’s loss of revenue last winter was a direct result of the cold weather.

underbab

5．AA：题库里有，就是说某个公司为了提高竞争优势，决定donate exceeds 给一家知名的环境组织，为了 exchange 它的logo在公司的card上。说因为近期的一个poll显示现在越来越多的人关注环境问题。所以这个策略会吸引更多的new customer。可以charge more interest rate。

题库原题：34. The following appeared as part of a plan proposed by an executive of the Easy Credit Company to the president.
“The Easy Credit Company would gain an advantage over competing credit card services if we were to donate a portion of the proceeds from the use of our cards to a well-known environmental organization in exchange for the use of its symbol or logo on our card. Since a recent poll shows that a large percentage of the public is concerned about environmental issues, this policy would attract new customers, increase use among existing customers, and enable us to charge interest rates that are higher than the lowest ones available.”

范文：In this argument the author concludes that the Easy Credit Company would gain several advantages over its competitors by donating a portion of its profits to a well-known environmental organization in exchange for the use of the organization’s logo on their credit card. The author reaches this conclusion on the basis of a recent poll that shows widespread public concern about environmental issues. Among the advantages of this policy, the author foresees an increase in credit card use by existing customers, the ability to charge higher interest rates, and the ability to attract new customers. While the author’s argument has some merit, it suffers from two critical problems.
To begin with, the author assumes that the environmental organization whose logo is sought is concerned with the same environmental issues about which the poll shows widespread concern. However, the author provides no evidence that this is the case. It is possible that very few credit-card users are concerned about the issues that are the organization’s areas of concern; if so, then it is unlikely that the organization’s logo would attract much business for the Easy Credit Company.
Next, the author assumes that the public’s concern about environmental issues will result in its taking steps to do something about the problem—in this case, to use the Easy Credit Company credit card. This assumption is unsupported and runs contrary to experience. Also, it is more reasonable to assume that people who are concerned about a particular cause will choose a more direct means of expressing their concern.
In conclusion, the author’s argument is unconvincing as it stands. To strengthen the argument, the author must show a positive link between the environmental issues about which the public has expressed concern and the issues with which this particular environmental organization is concerned. In addition, the author must provide evidence to support the assumption that concern about a problem will cause people to do something about the problem.

underbab

6. 坐稳： AA university hospitals are less better than other hospitals. 说university hospital 医生少20%，治愈率也少百分之多少，还说医生干了别的很多什么事之类的。
感谢某贝
题库原题：43. The following appeared in an article in the health section of a newspaper.
“There is a common misconception that university hospitals are better than community or private hospitals. This notion is unfounded, however: the university hospitals in our region employ 15 percent fewer doctors, have a 20 percent lower success rate in treating patients, make far less overall profit, and pay their medical staff considerably less than do private hospitals. Furthermore, many doctors at university hospitals typically divide their time among teaching, conducting research, and treating patients. From this it seems clear that the quality of care at university hospitals is lower than that at other kinds of hospitals.”
范文：In this argument the author concludes that university hospitals provide no better care than private or community hospitals. The author bases this conclusion on the following claims about university hospitals: the ones in this region employ 15 percent fewer doctors; they have a 20 percent lower success rate in treating patients; they pay their staffs less money; they make less profit than community hospitals; and they utilize doctors who divide their time between teaching, research and treating patients. This argument is unconvincing for several reasons.
The most egregious reasoning error in the argument is the author’s use of evidence pertaining to university hospitals in this region as the basis for a generalization about all university hospitals. The underlying assumption operative in this inference is that university hospitals in this region are representative of all university hospitals. No evidence is offered to support this gratuitous assumption.
Secondly, the only relevant reason offered in support of the claim that the quality of care is lower in university hospitals than it is at other hospitals is the fact that university hospitals have a lower success rate in treating patients. But this reason is not sufficient to reach the conclusion in question unless it can be shown that the patients treated in both types of hospitals suffered from similar types of maladies. For example, if university hospitals routinely treat patients suffering from rare diseases whereas other hospitals treat only those who suffer from known diseases and illnesses, the difference in success rates would not be indicative of the quality of care received.
Finally, the author assumes that the number of doctors a hospital employs, its success rate in treating patients, the amount it pays its staff, and the profits it earns are all reliable indicators of the quality of care it delivers. No evidence is offered to support this assumption nor is it obvious that any of these factors is linked to the quality of care delivered to patients. Moreover, the fact that doctors in university hospitals divide their time among many tasks fails to demonstrate that they do a poorer job of treating patients than doctors at other kinds of hospitals. In fact, it is highly likely that they do a better job because they are more knowledgeable than other doctors due to their teaching and research.
In conclusion, the author’s argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to demonstrate that university hospitals in this region are representative of all university hospitals, as well as establishing a causal link between the various factors cited and the quality of care delivered to patients.

underbab

7. AA：一家叫Provincia的航空公司  今年油价上涨 导致飞机运营成本上涨
这家P公司又增加了航线 发现利润降低 而又发现同行业的公司并没有因为油价上涨而导致利润下跌
P公司认为是新增的航线才导致的利润下跌 所以要停止新航线来挽回利润损失
感谢babesuk

V2：AA: 某航空公司发现，上个季profits减少了20%。写报告的人认为是燃油涨价造成的。但是他又提到，别的航空公司也面临燃油贵的问题，但仍然有公司是improve profits.所以他最后的结论就是，因为我们公司增加了新的flight, 所以燃油cost更多。为了improve profit，公司应该eliminate the new flights we added the ealier year.
感谢kimtara

下面的考古特别感谢泡沫星辰 同学~~撒花~~~
考古：卢月寂静（16）（16）本月机经7次 上月机经4次
某个航空公司去年利润下降，他们就认为原因肯定是因为油价上涨和新开了航线中的至少一个，而去年所有的公司都经历了油价上涨，但仍然有公司盈利，所以油价肯定不是利润减少的原因。因此，公司把新开的航线关闭了就可以提高利润。

V2好像是机经里的，什么有一个Provincia Airlines，profits下降了，CEO觉得是油价上涨或者是new flights added导致的。他又发现其他airlines虽然也面临油价上涨问题，但是仍然有航线的利润是上升的，因此他得出结论应当是new flights added导致了利润下降，认为应该减少flights added。

V3一个航空公司去年的利润降低了。然后是因为油价的上升，导致了燃油费用上升。然后P航空公司增加了航班，结果导致了利润降低。然而其他航空公司也面临着油价上升，但有些却从中盈利了。所以说是因为增设了航班导致了公司利润降低。所以应该在今年年初把新设的航班eliminate。

V4. 一个是航空公司利润的下降是因为燃油成本的上升。

V5.是“Provinca(一个航空公司的名字大概这么拼) 去年的的profit 减少了，然后公司认为有2个原因1. Oil price increases 2. Add a new flight operations. 因为Oil Price 对于所有其他的航空公司也上升，但是其他的一些航空公司却还是有increase their profit. 所以这不是原因， 那就只能是因为the new addedflight operation造成的.所以公司建议关掉这个operations.

V6.  JJ里说航空公司利润下降20%是因为新加了5个flights的原因

我给的错误是一个是其他原因导致，就是除了他说的2个还有非常有可能其他原因，举例是 a well-known litigation with customers 或者 seriousflight accident happened last year 影响了reputation of thecompany. 第二个是说错误类比，其他公司盈利可能是因为其他原因比如更好的policy to handle the increasing oil price, while this company do notuse.

V6某个航空公司去年利润下降，他们就认为原因肯定是因为油价上涨和新开了航线中的至少一个，而去年所有的公司都经历了油价上涨，但仍然有公司盈利，所以油价肯定不是利润减少的原因。因此，公司把新开的航线关闭了就可以提高利润。   
zelda爱star提供的观点
1.FA。每家公司都是不一样的，那个什么other airplane可能飞机比较小，耗油比较少
2.不仅仅只有这两个原因，可能本身P的管理成本有上升。
3.别的airline可能由于别的原因导致油价的上涨并不影响其profit 比如提供discount tickets.
4即使P停止，也不一定利润上升。

LZ思路：1.可能还有其他原因导致利润下跌而非仅仅因为新航线。比如公司人力成本之类的上涨
2.停止新航线不能挽回利润损失，甚至导致前期投入全部作废，损失更大
3.其他公司没有因为油价上涨而导致利润下降不代表对本公司也是同样情况，可能其他公司技术先进省油神马的~~~

underbab

8.上月JJ5次
AA: 两个store,一个叫Disc 神马的,是music store, 打了radio advertisement之后, foot traffic 增加了很多. 而另一个叫Carol's 的clothing store, 没有提打没打广告, business profit比music store差很多. 所以结论是radio advertisement 一定比newspaper advertisement能boost business.
我觉得逻辑谬误挺明显的, foot traffic 增加不代表business grow,有人可能只看不买啊...还有没有充分的理由证明,是广告吸引了customer,而不是customer的intrinsic preference....
感谢VickyloveCD

从六月JJ借来的：No.124 The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Carlo’s Clothing to the staff:
“Since Disc Depot, the music store on the next block, began a new radio advertising campaign last year, its business has grown dramatically, as evidenced by the large increase in foot traffic into the store. While the Disc Depot’s owners have apparently become wealthy enough to retire, profits at Carlo’s Clothing have remained stagnant for the past three years. In order to boost our sales and profits, we should therefore switch from newspaper advertising to frequent radio advertisements like those for Disc Depot.”(124)
124. Carlo's服饰老板给员工的备忘录：
由于Disc Depot，相邻街区的音像店从去年开始新的电台广告，它的业务显著增长，从商店人流量的大量增加就可以看出。当Disc Depot的老板显然已经足够富有可以退休时，Carlo's服饰的利润3年来一直停滞不变。为了促进我们的销售和利润，我们应该像DiscDepot一样从报纸广告转向经常的电台广告
思路参考：
1. 错误类比。Depot Disc是music/entertainment industry而Carol’s Clothing是fashion，之类的。
2. 错误结论。increase of foot traffic可以说是有更多的顾客来或者是顾客在店里呆了更长时间，但是不一定是profit增加了。
3. Clothing store的profit少也许有别的原因，而不是marketing不够。

underbab

9.organic food, 健身房卖organic food八股文
感谢TorresHu   （这样的JJ让LZ内牛满面啊。。。）

从六月JJ摘来的~~~~ 上个月4次
一个在中等大小的城市开a chain of gyms的公司经理认为：A survey of the customers 显示了a high level of interest on eating healthier, 有一种eating healthier 的方式是吃organic food，这种食品没有农药和？（我忘了…）。而且这个地方还没有卖organic food的。然后好像是说这个城市有这个方面的市场，而且还没有其他公司进来（又或者是防止其他外地公司进来），这个公司就打算在include an organic section at each location， 这样他们一定能够提高盈利
说有个调查发现人们越来越喜欢吃健康的食物，于是某fitness gyms决定要在三个section售卖有机食品以期提高利润。

V2.是说一个manager写给Health Fitness还是啥的一个好像是健身连锁公司的建议的
根据 a recent survey,发现这个公司的customers大多是organic grocery的潜在顾客吧【这完全是我自己的表达，我记不得原材料了，我理解就是它是说这个survey显示organic grocery在这个company的顾客群中是很有市场的】，然后这个organic grocery要求所在城市有机、未使用农药杀虫剂的蔬菜供应，好像还有一个条件不记得了然后就直接说所以这个company所在的城市显然很适合开organic grocery。建议公司在national organic grocery chains进驻这个city前赶紧建，而且是expand all three fitness gyms to include a organic grocery.说通过此可以增加公司的利润。
V3对一个fitness gym顾客的调查发现他们对吃的健康很感兴趣，所以政府会支持建卖有机食品的店。所以这个gym为了扭转利润长久的不增长因该在所有门店增设利润很高的有机食品店。
V4 一个survey表明人们越来越注重饮食健康，喜欢吃organic food, 所以得出结论当地的fitness gyms应该有grocery store，而且要赶在别的商家进来之前
V5 People are interested in eating healthier, one way is to eat organic food which is grown without chemical and pesticide. Government is supportive for organic food. One grocery manager is recommending expanding their 3 out of 4 existing store to sell organic food.
V6 大概是讲一个调查说这个城市的人开始想健康饮食了，然后一种有机食品商店是健康饮食的一个因素，然后么一个GYM说要在里面也建那个商店，给出理由是什么大的连锁还没进来，要快点建，然后要在其三家GYM都扩展这个业务什么的，这样一来会增加利润之类的。  有心的人去考古一下吧，不过我没找到...
V7 就是最近的一个survey得出结论，现在的人更喜欢吃的营养，而吃的营养的一种方法就是吃有机食品。所以作者就建议说在那个市里开有机食品店，在这种有机食品还没有普遍的情况下打开市场。而且这个店要开在体育馆里，还是三个体育馆每个都设立这样一个grocery food store(类似)这样可以增加体育馆的收入。
主要有的问题是 survey本身的问题，recently太模糊，还有无因果，无端假设，我觉得还有错误类比，过去推将来这样的trend
V8from a customer survey, people like to buy organic food.and the government is ready to support organic stores. therefore, business manager recommended to establish organic food section in the company's three gyms.那个

underbab

10. AA：说的是一个卖车的厂商把在六月重点展示和广告奢侈产品线，二月展示了不贵的产品线，结果利润在六月达到最高，所以他家打算以后就重点搞奢侈品了啥的
感谢出方告

上月JJ考古：
说是一个汽车分销商6月在当地报纸上打了luxury models的广告，并且把luxury models挪到展厅最显著的位置，结果6月总的sales大涨。2月展厅显著位置放的是不太贵的models，结果sales比较低。然后一个销售经理就说可见人们看到luxury models了就能选了什么variety of models，然后就建议常年把luxury models放在展厅中间。
V2. 一间车行6月份报纸广告和展示厅都主推豪华车，结果当月各档车销量都有上升。2月广告和展示厅都主推便宜的车款，结果销量较低。因此应该全年广告主打豪华车，并将豪华车放在展示厅的主要位置来吸引过客，从而增加潜在客户并提高各款车的销量。

提供思路：
1，6月份的广告是报纸形式，而2月份的广告形式未说明。所以需要讨论不同广告形式的效果。
2，2月份和6月份人们的消费习惯和可支配收入情况有可能不同，例如2月可能消费者刚刚经过圣诞节的购买热（shopping spree）因此可支配收入有限，具体情况需要进一步分析。
3，纵然展示豪华车款可能可以吸引更多目光驻足店内，但并不一定可以转换为潜在客户。且即使有受豪华车款吸引的潜在客户，其购买非豪华车款的可能性也不是必然，所以很难说全线各车款都可以销售增长。

LZ一点点思路：1.二月和六月的情况不完全一样，其他原因导致六月利润高。错误类比
2.重点搞奢侈品会失去很多客户和市场份额，对企业的发展不利，也使其在竞争中难以生存
3.全部搞奢侈品的投资和成本很高，可能导致流动资金不足，对其发展不利