求助OG12-77

hoteldeville

The author of the passage mentions the supervision of
schools primarily in order to
(A) remind readers of the role education played in
the cultural changes of the nineteenth century in
the United States
(B) suggest an area in which nineteenth-century
American women were relatively free to exercise
power
(C) provide an example of an occupation for which
accurate data about women’s participation are
diffi cult to obtain
(D) speculate about which occupations were
considered suitable for United States women of
the nineteenth century
(E) illustrate how the answers to questions about
women’s status depend on particular contexts

答案是E, 通过排除前面的选项得到的，但觉得理解得还不充分。NN能帮忙解释下如下定位部分的意思吗？

More importantly,she shows that the debate itself depends on frame of reference: in many respects, women lost power in relation to men, for example, as certain jobs (delivering babies, supervising schools) were taken over by men.

sunnybyy

我不是NN，我只是看懂了，试着来说一下
More importantly,she shows that the debate itself depends on frame of reference: in many respects, women lost power in relation to men, for example, as certain jobs (delivering babies, supervising schools) were taken over by men.
我对这句的理解的直译（翻译的不好）：更重要的是，她知道这个争论本身是依靠于参考背景的：比如说，在很多方面，女人失去了power是因为与男性的关系，某些职业（接生婴儿，掌管学校）就被男性所接任。
意译就是说，一个问题的争论其实是取决于这个争论的参照背景是什么。比如说，在很多方面，女性之所以失去了权力，是与男性有关的，比如很多原来由女性从事的行业（接生，主管学校）都被男性接管了，那么相对来看，女性在被接管的领域的权利就失去了。

我自己总结的规律就是 一般出现在文章末尾或者一段话末尾的例子，都是为这个例子紧前的一个论点服务的，所以几乎所有in order to题，都找到这个例子前的论点然后对应答案就行了。文章举这个例子就是为了说问题的争论取决于争论参照的背景，在上面那个例子中，假如没有说男性接管了原本属于女性的工作，假如只是女性自己不愿意再从事这样的工作了，那么在这些职业方面，女性的力量就不能被说是“失去了”。而通过描写男性接管这些工作，对比一下，那么就是女性在这些领域不能再从事工作，那么就是权力被男性取代了，这时候争论才成立。
希望对你有帮助

zhongzhongs

很完整, 懂了！

hoteldeville

感激涕零!!