返回列表 发帖

问一道gwd题,谢谢!

 

GWD-8-Q14: GWD-2-11

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives.  However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 

A.        These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.

B.        Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reactions.

C.        Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.

D.        Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.

E.         Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.

 

 


这是GWD第6套的第14题,答案是E,但我怎么看都觉得不对劲,请各位高手帮忙分析一下噢,谢拉!!

 

收藏 分享

我晕 明明是一个逻辑题目 竟然放在数学版上

 

准备3年内学会4种语言

TOP

是说这个东西只要不是人工添加的就不会导致坏结果吧(Not large enough),所以那些没有人工添加的就不会有危险,  个人之见,还需大牛来解答.

TOP

题目:不添加——》喝着安全


那是没有ruleout这个可能:如果不添加但是sulfites本身在酒里就存在了呢?


所以假设就是:Sulffites不是naturaly present在酒里(并且还到令人过敏的量)的~E~

TOP

题目说工人制造了不加导致过敏的sulfites的wine,所以对sulfites过敏的人就可以喝wine了。

假设是:天然sulfites存在在wine里面的的sulfites不足以导致过敏,意味着不加就不构成过敏。

TOP

原文说wine添加了sulfites就会allergic reaction ,结论是为了使人们不allergic reaction ,排除他因,就是排除wine本身含有sulfites足够使人allergic reaction 大概是这样吧

TOP

naturally present,天然存在的意思

TOP

原来是naturally present,怪不得怎么看怎么不顺眼~~谢谢

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看