返回列表 发帖

一道逻辑题求解[求助]

In a study of the effect of color on productivity,50 of 100 factory workers were moved from their drab workroom to a brightly colored workroom. Bothe these workers and the 50 who remained in the drab workroom increased their productivity, probalbly as a result of the interest taken by researchers in the work of both groups during the study.Which of the following,if true, woiuld cast most doubt upon the author's interpretation of the study results given above?
A The 50 workers moved to the brightly colored room performed precisely the same manufacturing task as the workers who remained in the drab workroom.
B.The drab workroom was designed to provide adequate space for at most 65 workers.
C.The 50 workers who moved to the brightly colored workroom were matched as closely as possible in age and level of training to the 50 workers who remained in the drab work-room.
D. Nearly all the workers in both groups had volunteered to move to the brightly colored workroom.
E Many of the workers who moved to the brightly colored workroom reported that they liked the drab workroom as well as or better than they liked the brightly colored workroom

答案是B。搞不懂,求大仙指点。
收藏 分享

现象:50人换到另一房间,效率都提高了
解释:是由于人们的兴趣
驳斥方向:不是人们的兴趣导致效率提高,有其他原因
b:房间本来就只能容纳65人,现在由100人减为50人,工作效率提高很自然嘛

TOP

非常感谢![em27]

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看