返回列表 发帖

陈向东黄皮逻辑假设系列第13题

in any negotiations between a party with limited aims and an opposing party with unlimited aims, the party with limited aims is bound to lose. this is because the scope of a negotiating party's aims determines the energy and the perseverance that will be brought to the negotiations by that party.

which of the following is an assumption implicit in the passage above?
A. the intensity with which parties conduct negotiations affects the outcome of those negotiations.
B. negotiations almost always pit against one another parties whose aims differ in scope.
C. the outcome of negotiations cannot be correctly predicted in advance.
D. a negotiator who has exceptionally high aims needs exceptional perseverance in order to avoid losing.
E. negotiating parties are typically not aware of the scope of each other's aims until the outcome os no longer in doubt.

答案选的是A。 我认为D是正确的嘛。
NN们,帮忙一下咯!谢谢诸位~
收藏 分享

试析
“the scope of a negotiating party's aims” determines "the energy

and the perseverance"-------lose or not
所以“能量和恒心(the energy and the perseverance)” 是成败的关键,

暗含“强度(intensity)”决定成败。

所以选A

选项D. a negotiator who has exceptionally high aims needs exceptional

perseverance in order to avoid losing.
题干中只是提到了目标范围,而没有提到目标高低;同时,成败不仅取决于

“perseverance”,还取决于“energy”.

TOP

D mentions negotiator, which is out of scope, therefore, D is a wrong answer.

A mentions intensity, which is out of scope, too, therefore, A is a wrong answer as well.

Again, a poorly written CR question.

TOP

A很直接的说出了假设
而D是无关选项
依然取非
若是A,则为:intensity和negotiation无关
那么原文的逻辑链断掉
而D:则为a negotiator who has exceptionally high aims  DOES NOT need

exceptional perseverance in order to avoid losing
对原文无影响

TOP

I did not see the word intensity in the stimulus.

TOP

谢谢你们的解释,明白了!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看